Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 11, 2025
Date Accepted: Aug 14, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

Turner W, Fessele K, Fandler M, Ehlers JP, Nitsche J

Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e87587

DOI: 10.2196/87587

PMID: 42743531

Teaching ACS High Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-based Materials in Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

  • Wiebke Turner; 
  • Klaus Fessele; 
  • Martin Fandler; 
  • Jan P. Ehlers; 
  • Julia Nitsche

ABSTRACT

Background:

High-risk electrocardiogram (ECG) signs in acute coronary syndrome (ACS)—such as De Winter waves or the Aslanger sign—play a critical role in diagnosis and treatment decisions but remain underrepresented in clinical practice. Over the past decade, digital formats like podcasts and videos have gained popularity in medical self-study, particularly through Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAMed). However, few studies have empirically evaluated the effectiveness of FOAMed in teaching complex ECG content.

Objective:

This study evaluates the learning effectiveness of selected FOAMed formats (podcasts and videos) compared to traditional print materials (guidelines and textbooks) in teaching validated high-risk ECG signs of ACS to emergency medical professionals.

Methods:

A prospective, interprofessional, randomized controlled mixed-methods study (MERSQI score: 16.5/18) was conducted with 103 paramedics, prehospital emergency physicians, and emergency department clinicians in Germany. Participants completed a 30-minute self-study session using either traditional print materials or selected FOAMed content. Print resources were selected based on a prior survey of over 1,000 emergency professionals, identifying the most commonly used and recommended textbooks and guidelines. We assessed knowledge gain using pre- and post-tests consisting of 10 ECG cases and 10 text-based questions. We analyzed quantitative data using mixed ANOVA and evaluated qualitative feedback through content analysis according to Mayring.

Results:

At baseline, participants answered 56% of ECG cases and 46% of text questions correctly, with no significant differences between professional groups. The media-supported group showed a significantly greater increase in knowledge (ECG: +12.4%, p = .017; text: +11.3%, p = .033) and rated learning comfort and confidence in action more positively than the print media group. We observed knowledge deficits equally for both newer and established ECG signs.

Conclusions:

Digital self-learning formats such as podcasts and videos significantly enhance the interpretation of high-risk ECG signs in ACS. These formats offer a modern, user-friendly approach to lifelong learning. Empirical evidence for the effectiveness of FOAMed in clinical education supports its integration into curricula and continuing education to enhance clinical confidence and patient safety in emergency care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Turner W, Fessele K, Fandler M, Ehlers JP, Nitsche J

Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e87587

DOI: 10.2196/87587

PMID: 42743531

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.