Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 9, 2025 - Feb 3, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Trend in Devices and Digital Tools for Remote Consultation from Medical Providers to Specialists: A Scoping Review of Modalities, Disciplines, and Regional Practices
ABSTRACT
Background:
Digital healthcare technologies, including mobile applications and telemedicine platforms, have transformed how medical professionals communicate and deliver care. Remote consultation between medical providers and specialists plays a vital role in ensuring access to appropriate expertise, particularly in medically underserved or geographically remote areas. However, the diversity in technological modalities, devices, and patterns of use across specialties and regions has not been systematically mapped.
Objective:
This scoping review aimed to explore the current status and characteristics of teleconsultations among medical providers and specialists, focusing on device use, consultation modalities, clinical specialties, and regional differences. Through this approach, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of technological and practical trends in mobile health (mHealth) and telemedicine.
Methods:
A systematic scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines using the MEDLINE and Embase databases. The search covered studies published up to March 2024, with no restrictions on the publication year. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria were also included.
Results:
In total, 113 citations were screened, of which 79 articles were included. Studies were analyzed according to consultation method, target, and regional characteristics. Of these, 83.5% were in the doctor-to-doctor category. E-mail, videoconference, and app-based consultations were the most common, with videoconference use decreasing and app use increasing annually. Approximately 90% of the studies used medical images, most frequently photographs. Orthopedics and dermatology were the most frequently involved specialties, followed by internal medicine. Regarding regions, 58.2% of consultations were domestic and 41.8% were international. Rural-to-urban domestic consultations comprised 45.7%, whereas consultations from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs) accounted for 30.3%.
Conclusions:
This review examined doctor-to-doctor and doctor-to-patient consultations with doctor involvement. Specialties in which medical images are central, such as orthopedics and dermatology, were more frequently represented than in other fields. This highlights disparities in the use of teleconsultation across clinical disciplines and suggests that addressing these imbalances is essential for broader adoption. Furthermore, the findings indicated a progressive shift from videoconference-based interactions to mobile and app-based platforms, reflecting ongoing technological advancements. Optimizing the integration of these digital tools and promoting equitable access are critical for enhancing the quality and reach of teleconsultation practices in future digital health systems. Clinical Trial: Not applicable. This study is a scoping review and does not involve a clinical trial. This review has been registered in the Open Science Framework Registry (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K4TVU).
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.