Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Nov 9, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 10, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Artificial Intelligence Governance in Health Systems: A Systematic Review of Frameworks and an Integrative Model Proposal
ABSTRACT
Background:
Robust and adaptive artificial intelligence (AI) governance frameworks are essential to ensure the responsible, sustainable and effective integration of AI-based technologies in health systems (HS). Over the past decade, numerous frameworks for governing AI in HS have been developed to foster accountability, support implementation and mitigate risks such as bias, compromised quality of care, data breaches and adverse financial impacts. However, current frameworks often fail to reflect the multidimensional and dynamic nature of AI governance in HS.
Objective:
This study had two objectives: (1) To review and synthesize existing AI governance frameworks for HS; and (2) To propose an Integrative AI Governance Model that identifies key components to guide AI-related policy, practice and research in HS.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of AI governance frameworks for HS published from November 2014 to July 2025. Sources included eight academic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ACM Digital Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Social Sciences Abstracts and PsycINFO), grey-literature databases, and the web portals of international organizations. Inclusion criteria covered peer-reviewed articles and reports proposing a framework, guideline, standard or position statement on the governance of AI in HS. We excluded abstracts, letters to the editor, commentaries, essays, viewpoints, conference proceedings, and articles in languages other than English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Two reviewers independently selected papers, assessed framework quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for Health Systems (AGREE-HS), and extracted data. A thematic analysis was then conducted.
Results:
A total of 18 AI governance frameworks for HS were identified. Most were published between 2022 and 2024 and were rated as moderate or low quality. The frameworks targeted four levels: international (n = 3), national (n = 4), local (n = 3) and organizational (n = 8). The composition of actors within governance structures varied across levels. Six key governance processes in HS emerged as critical: (1) Needs and/or problem identification; (2) Data governance; (3) Risk assessment and management; (4) Validation and/or evaluation; (5) Maintenance and monitoring; and (6) Integration. Four pivotal relational mechanisms were identified: (1) Ethical principles and/or values; (2) Education and training; (3) Standards and regulations; and (4) Communication. Barriers and challenges included poor alignment across interconnected policy domains and governance levels, the substantial resources required for effective implementation, and the ongoing demands of continuous monitoring of AI-based technologies.
Conclusions:
The findings highlight key elements of AI governance, including structures, processes and relational mechanisms, distributed across the international, national, local and organizational levels. The proposed Integrative AI Governance Model for HS aims to inform constructive policy and practice discussions on how to ensure the responsible, sustainable and effective integration of AI-based technologies into HS. Clinical Trial: The protocol for the systematic review has been registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MCBTS
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.