Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Nov 7, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 8, 2025 - Jan 3, 2026
Date Accepted: May 26, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact of a Practical, Hands-On, Continuing Professional Development Course About AI in Health Care Professions Education on the Perceptions and Behaviors of Health Care Educators: Qualitative Case Study

Peacock JG, Merkebu J, Samuel A

Impact of a Practical, Hands-On, Continuing Professional Development Course About AI in Health Care Professions Education on the Perceptions and Behaviors of Health Care Educators: Qualitative Case Study

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e87381

DOI: 10.2196/87381

PMID: 42337802

The Impact of a Practical, Hands-On, Continuing Professional Development Course about AI in Healthcare Professions Education on the Perceptions and Behaviors of Healthcare Educators: A Qualitative Case Study

  • Justin G. Peacock; 
  • Jerusalem Merkebu; 
  • Anita Samuel

ABSTRACT

Background:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being utilized in many aspects of society, including healthcare and education. AI has the potential to enhance healthcare delivery, education, and administration. Healthcare trainees will increasingly be required to master these AI technologies. To teach trainees to effectively and ethically leverage AI technologies, educators must be appropriately trained and empowered to use these technologies.

Objective:

We developed a health professions education course to enable healthcare professionals to overcome their fears and concerns about integrating AI technologies into daily practice. The course was also designed to foster competency and facility with AI tools in educational, administrative, research, and clinical activities.

Methods:

Employing a multi-method approach, we analyzed data gathered from three different sources using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase reflexive thematic analysis. This involved familiarization with the data sources, generating initial codes, developing, refining, and defining the themes, and finally, writing up the results.

Results:

Our findings indicate that learners initially described misconceptions towards AI, frequently accompanied by negative and crippling affect, such as fear. It was only after experiential engagement with AI technologies that they were able to shift their perspectives and gain the confidence to integrate AI technologies in their daily practice.

Conclusions:

A brief six-week course on the use of AI technologies for healthcare professional educators, focused on experiential and peer-based learning, resulted in dramatic shifts in affect towards the technologies and their applications. It also propelled learners to shift increasingly outward in their discussion, application, and advocacy for AI technologies in their daily practice. Clinical Trial: Not Applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Peacock JG, Merkebu J, Samuel A

Impact of a Practical, Hands-On, Continuing Professional Development Course About AI in Health Care Professions Education on the Perceptions and Behaviors of Health Care Educators: Qualitative Case Study

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e87381

DOI: 10.2196/87381

PMID: 42337802

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.