Currently accepted at: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Nov 4, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 4, 2025 - Dec 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 3, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/87094
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Feasibility and Behavioral Impact of an AI-Enabled Workplace Health Screening Machine in a Low-Resource Urban Setting: A Pilot Implementation Study in the Philippines
ABSTRACT
Background:
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled health screening offers new opportunities to detect noncommunicable disease (NCD) risks in resource-limited settings. However, evidence on real-world feasibility, user acceptance, and behavioral outcomes of such tools in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited.
Objective:
Objective:
This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and short-term behavioral impact of DigiHealth, an AI-enabled health screening machine deployed among public school teachers in the Southern Philippines.
Methods:
Methods:
A cross-sectional implementation study was conducted among 384 teachers who underwent biometric and biochemical screening (BMI, blood pressure, fasting blood sugar, HbA1c, and lipid profile) using DigiHealth. Post-screening surveys measured perceived ease of use, reliability, privacy, and follow-up health behaviors. Quantitative data were analyzed using Welch’s t-test, χ², and logistic regression. The study was guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Health Belief Model (HBM).
Results:
Results:
Most participants were female (81.2%; median age 44 years). Males showed higher systolic blood pressure (130.7 vs 125.2 mmHg, P=.04) and triglycerides (171 vs 144 mg/dL). Overall, 85% rated DigiHealth as “good” or “excellent,” and 93% found it easy to use. Seventy percent consulted a health professional, and 67% reported lifestyle modification after screening. Age was inversely associated with clustering of ≥3 metabolic risk factors (P=.01).
Conclusions:
Conclusions:
AI-assisted workplace screening is feasible, acceptable, and behaviorally activating in low-resource contexts. DigiHealth demonstrates how pragmatic, fit-for-purpose AI innovations can complement national NCD programs and promote early detection in institutional settings within LMICs. Clinical Trial: NA
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.