Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 23, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Validation of the Updated Digital Health Literacy Instrument and Development of a Short Form: Online Survey Study of the General Population

van der Vaart R, Tuitert I, van 't Veer J, Drossaert C

Validation of the Updated Digital Health Literacy Instrument and Development of a Short Form: Online Survey Study of the General Population

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e86879

DOI: 10.2196/86879

Validation of the Updated Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI 2.0) and Development of a Short Form: Results from an Online Survey

  • Rosalie van der Vaart; 
  • Inge Tuitert; 
  • Job van 't Veer; 
  • Constance Drossaert

ABSTRACT

Background:

The Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) was developed in 2017 to measure individuals’ ability to access, understand, evaluate, and apply online health information. As the digital world and digital health technologies have evolved rapidly, with the widespread use of mobile devices, apps, and enhanced data security requirements, the original DHLI required updating.

Objective:

This study aimed to revise and validate an updated version of the DHLI (DHLI 2.0) that reflects current digital health practices and to examine the psychometric properties of a short-form version to facilitate broader use in research and practice.

Methods:

The DHLI 2.0 comprises 24 items across eight skill domains, including a newly added subscale on data security. Items were updated to incorporate the use of mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets) and to reflect current online behaviors. Data were collected in June 2024 through an online survey among members of a representative citizen panel in Friesland, the Netherlands (n=2728). Socio-demographics, internet and health-related internet use, general health literacy (measured with the Single Item Literacy Screener), self-reported health, and healthcare use were assessed. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, and construct validity was assessed via Spearman’s rho correlations with related constructs.

Results:

Internal consistency was high for both the full (α=.94) and short-form (α=.90) scales. Most subscales showed satisfactory to excellent reliability (α=.71–.93), while “Securing privacy” and “Using security measures” demonstrated moderate reliability (α=.65–.66). The DHLI 2.0 total scores were approximately normally distributed (skewness –0.5; kurtosis 0.4). As expected, digital health literacy was negatively correlated with age (ρ=-.39, P<.001) and positively correlated with education (ρ=.22, P<.001), income (ρ=.27, P<.001), time spent online (ρ=.32, P<.001), and general health literacy (ρ=-.42, P<.001).

Conclusions:

The DHLI 2.0 provides an updated, reliable, and valid measure of digital health literacy covering eight key domains, including data security. The 16-item short form offers a concise alternative suitable for research and possibly practical applications in health and eHealth contexts.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van der Vaart R, Tuitert I, van 't Veer J, Drossaert C

Validation of the Updated Digital Health Literacy Instrument and Development of a Short Form: Online Survey Study of the General Population

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e86879

DOI: 10.2196/86879

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.