Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 30, 2025 - Dec 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 17, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions in Pediatric Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Yao H, Wen Y, Wang H, Xiao Y, Deng M, Yang W, Li Y, Mao X

Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions in Pediatric Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e86836

DOI: 10.2196/86836

PMID: 42018994

Effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) interventions in pediatric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Huilu Yao; 
  • Yiting Wen; 
  • Hongxiu Wang; 
  • Ying Xiao; 
  • Meiling Deng; 
  • Wei Yang; 
  • Yuqin Li; 
  • Xiaorong Mao

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cancer is a significant threat to children’s health, and Mobile health (mHealth) is emerging as a key tool for remote disease management, health education, and follow-up. However, evidence for its effectiveness remains limited.

Objective:

Summarizes the effects of mobile health interventions in pediatric cancer, providing evidence-based support for optimizing intervention models and improving patient outcomes.

Methods:

A systematic search of 14 databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on mobile health applications for pediatric cancer patients from inception to August 1, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, assessed bias risk, and graded evidence quality. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.

Results:

24 RCTs involving 2,705 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that mobile health interventions significantly improved quality of life (SMD=1.34, p=0.04), treatment adherence (OR=3.43, p=0.0002) and self-management ability (SMD=6.39, p=0.01), while reducing infection rates (OR=0.25, p=0.002), PICC complications (OR=0.17, p<0.00001), PICC catheter occlusion (OR=0.33, p=0.002) and dislodgement (OR=0.29, p<0.0001). mHealth showed no significant effect on catheter displacement, and further high-quality studies are needed to verify its impact on health knowledge. Intervention components covered 9 categories, including Goals and planning, Feedback and monitoring, Social support, Shaping knowledge, and Natural consequences et al. Overall evidence quality was moderate.

Conclusions:

Mobile health interventions have been shown to improve quality of life, treatment adherence, PICC management outcome and self-management ability in pediatric cancer patients while reducing infections. However, most studies have small samples, short follow-ups, and lack cost-effectiveness analysis. Larger, high-quality RCTs are needed to verify these effects. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO, number: CRD420251108938


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yao H, Wen Y, Wang H, Xiao Y, Deng M, Yang W, Li Y, Mao X

Effectiveness of Mobile Health Interventions in Pediatric Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e86836

DOI: 10.2196/86836

PMID: 42018994

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.