Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Nursing

Date Submitted: Oct 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Feb 19, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Nurses’ Evaluation of a Service Robot for Inpatient Care: Technology Acceptance Study

Friese C, Klebbe R, Heimann-Steinert A

Nurses’ Evaluation of a Service Robot for Inpatient Care: Technology Acceptance Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e86824

DOI: 10.2196/86824

PMID: 41980241

A New Kind of Colleague for the Future? Nurses’ Evaluation of a Service Robot for Inpatient Care – A Technology Acceptance Study

  • Christopher Friese; 
  • Robert Klebbe; 
  • Anika Heimann-Steinert

ABSTRACT

Background:

The integration of robotic systems into nursing practice is increasingly discussed as a potential strategy to alleviate workload and support care processes in response to demographic changes and staffing shortages. However, the acceptance of nursing staff as primary end-users remains a critical determinant for successful implementation. Despite technological advances, the practical requirements and perspectives of nursing staff have not been adequately considered in research and development efforts to date.

Objective:

Building on the user-centered development approach applied, this study aimed to examine nursing staff’s evaluation of a service robot designed to assist with routine tasks in inpatient care, as well as their intention to use it, while accounting for technology-specific and psychological determinants of acceptance.

Methods:

30 nurses tested the robot across three application scenarios (information service, item delivery, and beverage delivery) in a simulated care setting, alternating between the roles of nurse and care recipient. Acceptance-related constructs, including intention to use, were measured using the Technology Usage Inventory (TUI). General attitudes toward robots were assessed via the General Attitudes Towards Robots Scale (GAToRS). Participants’ prior experience with robotics was also documented. Spearman rank correlations and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for analysis.

Results:

The robot was rated positively across all dimensions. Usability was high (Mdn = 20; scale range: 3-21), as was perceived usefulness (Mdn = 21; range: 4-28). Skepticism was low (Mdn = 10.5; range: 4-28), and accessibility moderate (Mdn = 10; range: 3-21). Intention to use was strong (Mdn = 224.5; range: 0-300) and correlated positively with usability (rs(28) = .505, P = .004), perceived usefulness (rs(28) = .740, P < .001), and accessibility (rs(28) = .628, P < .001), and negatively with skepticism (rs(28) = -.516, P = .004). More positive personal attitudes toward robots were also associated with higher perceived usefulness (rs(28) = .549, P = .002) and greater intention to use (rs(28) = .483, P = .007). No significant differences in intention to use were found between participants with and without prior robotics experience (U = 83.5, P = .618).

Conclusions:

The findings indicate a high level of acceptance among the participating nursing staff for the developed service robot within the tested scenarios. Considering the chosen user-centered development approach, they further underscore the need for strategies that combine participatory design, transparent communication of system capabilities and limitations, and structured opportunities for hands-on experience. Such measures, together with proactive knowledge transfer and skills development, are essential to sustainably leverage the practical potential of service robotics in nursing practice. Clinical Trial: Open Science Framework EMS7B; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EMS7B


 Citation

Please cite as:

Friese C, Klebbe R, Heimann-Steinert A

Nurses’ Evaluation of a Service Robot for Inpatient Care: Technology Acceptance Study

JMIR Nursing 2026;9:e86824

DOI: 10.2196/86824

PMID: 41980241

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.