Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Diabetes

Date Submitted: Oct 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 5, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Obstacles and Enablers Related to Gestational Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Review Using the Socio-Eecological Model

LUK BHK, MA PHX, CHUNG RWM, ZHANG WW, Lam WWk

Obstacles and Enablers Related to Gestational Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Review Using the Socio-Eecological Model

JMIR Diabetes 2026;11:e86767

DOI: 10.2196/86767

PMID: 42224285

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Obstacles and Enablers to Gestational Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review Using the Socio-Ecological Model to Guide Digital Health Solutions

  • Bronya H. K. LUK; 
  • Polly H. X MA; 
  • Rosenna Wai Ming CHUNG; 
  • Wendy W ZHANG; 
  • William Wing-kuen Lam

ABSTRACT

Background:

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requires effective self-management to mitigate associated health risks. While digital health tools hold promise for supporting self-management, a comprehensive understanding of the multi-level factors influencing adherence is needed to design effective interventions

Objective:

This systematic review aimed to synthesize the barriers to and facilitators of GDM self-management across the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM), with the explicit goal of informing the design of future digital health interventions

Methods:

A systematic search was conducted across six databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) for literature published from 2010 to October 2025. Thirty studies (24 qualitative, 4 quantitative, 2 mixed-methods) were included. Data on barriers and facilitators were extracted and synthesized using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) as an analytical framework

Results:

The analysis identified 11 key factors across five SEM levels. Findings highlight critical intervention points for digital solutions: at the intrapersonal level (knowledge, emotional response); interpersonal level (functional support network); organizational level (healthcare access, workplace demands); community level (digital peer-support, food environment); and policy level (funding for digital health). The synthesis demonstrates how a digital platform could integrate strategies across these levels to provide holistic support

Conclusions:

Successful GDM self-management support requires addressing multi-level factors. This review provides an evidence-based framework for developing digital health interventions. The findings propose that a multi-level, digitally-enabled approach is essential to overcome existing barriers and leverage enablers, ultimately improving maternal and neonatal outcomes Clinical Trial: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42023491588.


 Citation

Please cite as:

LUK BHK, MA PHX, CHUNG RWM, ZHANG WW, Lam WWk

Obstacles and Enablers Related to Gestational Diabetes Self-Management: Systematic Review Using the Socio-Eecological Model

JMIR Diabetes 2026;11:e86767

DOI: 10.2196/86767

PMID: 42224285

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.