Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 31, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 3, 2025 - Dec 29, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
How to Satisfy Health Care Professionals’ Information Needs on the Quality of Health Apps – Developing a Health App Quality Report for CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2: Participatory Design Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Health apps, which comprise both medical and wellness apps, hold potential to improve prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of disease. Yet, adoption by health care professionals (HCP) including recommendation and prescription rates are low, even in countries where these apps are reimbursed. Professional guidelines from medical societies and trusted standardized health app quality assessment reports providing the information HCPs need to recommend or prescribe a specific app for an individual patient are crucial to enable this digital transformation of medicine. The CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2 (hereinafter “82304-2”) Technical Specification, an initiative of the European Commission, includes a research-based health app quality assessment framework comprising 81 quality requirements. Results of 82304-2 app assessments are summarized in a “health app quality label”. The 82304-2 label’s potential to increase willingness to recommend health apps was recently confirmed. However, to adequately inform HCPs for recommending and prescribing high-quality apps a more detailed “health app quality report” is required in addition to the 82304-2 label.
Objective:
To codesign the 82304-2 health app quality report by including the information detail that satisfies the information needs of individual HCPs in decision-making on a health app.
Methods:
A Participatory Design approach was applied to generate the report. In an 18-month process of participatory prototyping with 9 HCPs with digital health expertise the 82304-2 health app quality report was iteratively developed, designed, and validated. A convenience sample of 31 HCPs indicated the priority 82304-2 health app quality requirements that would inform their decision-making on recommending an app and as such need detailed quality information. Final feedback meetings with the 9 HCPs with digital health expertise and 8 medical societies were used to finalize the 82304-2 report design. Web-based questions in these meetings, as well as a comparative content analysis and the Health Education Materials Assessment Tool (HEMAT) were used to indicatively evaluate the 82304-2 report design.
Results:
In total 30/81 (37%) of the 82304-2 quality requirements were prioritized by >50% of the HCPs. The final 82304-2 report design provides detailed information for 27/30 (90%) of the prioritized 82304-2 quality requirements. The reporting detail for two 82304-2 quality requirements requires more research. The final feedback meetings, comparative content analysis and HEMAT provide indicative proof of the usefulness and usability of the 82304-2 report design.
Conclusions:
We succeeded in our aim to design the 82304-2 health app quality report and found promising potential for its distinctive usefulness for HCPs and medical societies. Further efforts are needed to test and fine-tune its multi-stakeholder and intercontinental usefulness and usability, to support medical societies in providing guidance and potentially training on recommending health apps, and to advance from the current design to a scalable fully-functional version of the 82304-2 report and associated open access database.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.