Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 5, 2025 - Dec 31, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Optimizing Rural Stroke Care: Video-Conferencing Teleconsultation Improves Transfer Efficiency and Functional Outcome

  • Chi Sheng Wang; 
  • Yi-Ju Chen; 
  • Tzu-Chieh Lin; 
  • Hui-Mei Huang; 
  • Pei-Ru Tu; 
  • Po-Lin Chen; 
  • Jin-An Huang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management in rural regions is challenged by interhospital transfer delays, impacting outcomes.

Objective:

This study evaluates the efficacy of video-conferencing teleconsultation on improving transfer efficiency and clinical outcomes in a hub-and-spoke model.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study (January 2022–December 2024) included AIS patients identified as potential EVT candidates, transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Patients were categorized into teleconsultation and standard referral process (SRP) groups. The primary outcome was door-in-door-out (DIDO) time, with additional analyses on its components. Secondary outcomes included stroke-related decision-making and 90-day functional outcome using modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Safety outcomes included all-cause mortality within 90 days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis and/or EVT.

Results:

A total of 83 patients were included, with 41 in the teleconsultation group and 42 in the SRP group (mean age: 73.3 years), and baseline characteristics were comparable. Teleconsultation significantly reduced DIDO time (95.2±22.9 vs. 132.3±41.5 minutes, p<0.001) by shortening CTA-to-ambulance notification time (44.6±17.4 vs. 79.5±37.6 minutes, p<0.001). Teleconsultation group had higher intravenous thrombolysis rates at the PSC (63.4% vs. 40.5%, p=0.04), higher EVT rates (34.2% vs. 14.3%, p=0.035) and shorter door-to-puncture time (83.0±35.5 vs. 118.5±25.9 minutes, p=0.04) at the CSC, with a significant shift toward better mRS at 90th day (OR: 4.55, p<0.001 vs. OR: 1.35, p=0.07). Safety outcomes were comparable between groups.

Conclusions:

Video-conferencing teleconsultation improves interhospital transfer efficiency, stroke-related decision-making, and functional outcomes. This study highlights its potential in optimizing rural stroke care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang CS, Chen YJ, Lin TC, Huang HM, Tu PR, Chen PL, Huang JA

Optimizing Rural Stroke Care: Video-Conferencing Teleconsultation Improves Transfer Efficiency and Functional Outcome

JMIR Preprints. 24/10/2025:86436

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.86436

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/86436

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.