Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2025
Date Accepted: May 25, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Automated Optic Disc Tilt Classification in Fundus Photographs Using Segmentation and the Elliptical Ratio: External Clinical Validation Study

Lim CY, Kim J, Kim J, Lee C, Song E, Chung MJ, Oh SY, Kim T, Park KA

Automated Optic Disc Tilt Classification in Fundus Photographs Using Segmentation and the Elliptical Ratio: External Clinical Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e86380

DOI: 10.2196/86380

PMID: 42390958

Automated Optic Disc Tilt Classification in Fundus Photography: Segmentation and Elliptical Ratio Across External Clinical Validation

  • Chae Yeon Lim; 
  • Jaeryung Kim; 
  • Joonhyoung Kim; 
  • Chaeyeon Lee; 
  • Euido Song; 
  • Myung Jin Chung; 
  • Sei Yeul Oh; 
  • Taeyoung Kim; 
  • Kyung Ah Park

ABSTRACT

Background:

Optic disc tilt is a morphological change in myopic eyes that complicates clinical interpretation and artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of fundus images. Accurate detection of optic disc tilt is necessary to avoid misinterpretation of disc morphology and enhance diagnostic reliability across different disease types.

Objective:

This study developed and externally validated an end-to-end AI-based pipeline for optic disc segmentation and quantitative tilt classification in color fundus photographs (CFPs), offering an objective alternative to manual segmentation and subjective clinical assessments.

Methods:

We trained a nnU-Net-based optic disc segmentation model on the Standardized Multi-Channel Dataset for Glaucoma (SMDG; 3,103 CFPs) and externally validated it on the Samsung Medical Center dataset (2,448 CFPs; 1,370 patients). Tilt was classified using the ratio of the long-distance diameter to short-distance diameter, with a ratio ≥ 1.3 indicating tilt. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intersection over union (IoU), and pixel accuracy on the SMDG and the clinical acceptance rate via expert review.

Results:

Using the SMDG, nnU-Net achieved outstanding performance (mean ± SD: DSC, 0.961 ± 0.055; IoU, 0.927 ± 0.057) across eight datasets. With the SMC dataset, expert review showed a mean clinical acceptance rate of 98.61% across disease types, ranging from 86.40% (edema) to 99.59% (pallor). Tilt was detected in 7.5% (186/2,448) of images, with rates of 9.7% (normal), 3.9% (glaucoma), 7.8% (pallor), and 14.2% (edema). Segmentation errors occurred in 1.4% (34/2,448) of cases, mainly due to edema-related swelling, peripapillary atrophy, and vessel confusion.

Conclusions:

Our pipeline provides objective and reproducible detection of optic disc tilt on CFPs, with strong generalization to clinical images. Replacing manual segmentation and subjective assessments, the pipeline supports tilt-aware AI diagnostics and scalable screening for myopia-related conditions, with future refinements needed for edema-related challenges.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lim CY, Kim J, Kim J, Lee C, Song E, Chung MJ, Oh SY, Kim T, Park KA

Automated Optic Disc Tilt Classification in Fundus Photographs Using Segmentation and the Elliptical Ratio: External Clinical Validation Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e86380

DOI: 10.2196/86380

PMID: 42390958

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.