Currently submitted to: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
Date Submitted: Oct 20, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 20, 2025 - Dec 15, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Traditional parenting styles and online parental mediation strategies: building a global parenting
ABSTRACT
Background:
The expansion of digital technologies has transformed the family environment, demanding new strategies from parents to guide and protect their children’s Internet use. While the literature widely discusses parental mediation, few studies analyze how traditional parenting styles are related online parental mediation (OPM) strategies and how parents’ age moderates these relationships.
Objective:
To examine the effects of three traditional parenting styles—inductive, rigid, and indulgent—on six OPM strategies, considering the moderating role of parents’ age.
Methods:
A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 672 parents (83.9% mothers) of children aged 9–14 years from 29 schools in 10 Spanish regions. Participants completed the Scale of Rules and Demands (ENE-P) and the EU-Global Kids Online Parental Mediation Questionnaire. Using 18 moderation models (PROCESS Model 1, bootstrapping with 5000 samples), we analyzed the predictive power of inductive, rigid, and indulgent parenting styles (predictors) on six OPM strategies—active mediation of Internet use (AMIU), active mediation of Internet safety (AMIS), child-initiated.
Results:
The inductive parenting style was positively related to all OPM strategies, and its effects were stronger among younger parents for AMIU (B = –.03, p < .01), AMIS (B = –.02, p = .04), and RM (B = –.01, p = .04). The indulgent style showed negative relationships with five OPM strategies (AMIU, AMIS, PM, TC, RM), while the rigid style showed no significant effects.
Conclusions:
Findings support the concept of global parenting, integrating offline and online parental regulation. Younger parents’ digital skills strengthen the positive effects of inductive parenting on Internet safety and autonomy. Programs should foster inductive strategies and enhance digital competence among older parents.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.