Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Oct 16, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 12, 2026
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Digital Peer-Support for Family Caregivers of Individuals with Neuromuscular Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Neuromuscular diseases (NMD) affect nerves and muscles resulting in weakness and often profound disability. Family caregivers of individuals with NMD experience significant burden and negative health effects. Peer support may help to ameliorate these negative impacts.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of a digital peer-support intervention compared to usual care on caregiver mastery, competence, stress, burden, anxiety, and depression among family caregivers of individuals with NMD.
Methods:
We conducted a parallel group randomized controlled superiority trial. We recruited family caregivers of individuals (children and adults) with NMD. The 12-week intervention comprised access to a trained peer mentor via aTouchAway (Aetonix, Canada) and weekly digital discussion forums. Primary outcome was caregiver mastery (Pearlin Mastery Scale (PMS)) adjusted for baseline score. Secondary outcomes included caregiver stress, competence, burden, anxiety, and depression. We calculated adjusted (for baseline score) mean differences (aMDs) using analysis of covariance and generated multivariable linear regression models exploring associations with the intervention and caregiver age, years of caregiving, care recipient medical diagnosis, care recipient ventilation type, adjusting for baseline outcome scores.
Results:
We recruited 100 participants, mean (SD) age 46.8 (11.6) years, 70% mothers, with mean (SD) length of caregiving 11.8 (7.6) years. We found no difference in 12-week PMS scores (aMD 0.67; 95% CI -1.7 to 3.1). We also found no difference in any of our secondary outcomes. Mentors and participants sent a mean (SD) of 21.3 (33.3) and 17.7 (33.0) messages, respectively. Overall, 62% of participants and 92% of mentors engaged in at least one program element for ≥ 8 of the 12 weeks.
Conclusions:
Our 12-week digital peer support program had no effect on caregiver mastery or other caregiving or psychological outcomes. This might be due to only moderate fidelity. Future research should focus on peer support interventions that are better tailored to improve intervention fidelity and ultimately caregiver well-being. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05070624; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05070624
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.