Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: Oct 23, 2025
Date Accepted: May 17, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Quantifying and Visualizing Emergency Physician Workflow: Observational Time-Motion Study

Henreid AJ, Ioannides KL, Pevnick JM, Cohen TN, Torbati SS, Nuckols TK, Berdahl CT

Quantifying and Visualizing Emergency Physician Workflow: Observational Time-Motion Study

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e85983

DOI: 10.2196/85983

PMID: 42496179

Quantifying and Visualizing Emergency Physician Workflow: Results of an Observational Time-Motion Study

  • Andrew J Henreid; 
  • Kimon L.H. Ioannides; 
  • Joshua M Pevnick; 
  • Tara N Cohen; 
  • Sam S Torbati; 
  • Teryl K Nuckols; 
  • Carl T Berdahl

ABSTRACT

Background:

Emergency physicians face considerable workflow challenges in the emergency department (ED) due to unpredictable work environments, frequent interruptions, and mounting documentation requirements. Excessive time away from direct patient care is increasingly viewed as detrimental to care quality, communication, and patient safety.

Objective:

This study aimed to quantify and visualize how emergency physicians allocate their time during ED shifts, particularly time spent on the computer.

Methods:

This observational time-motion pilot study was conducted in a high-volume, urban ED. We used a specialized application to continuously track physician activities including computer use, direct patient care, communication, and all other tasks carried out on shift. Electronic health record (EHR) event log data were queried to estimate physicians’ computer use after their scheduled shift. The main outcome was the proportion of time spent on each activity. The primary measure was total minutes of computer use (during and after shift) per scheduled hour of clinical work.

Results:

We observed 20 emergency physicians for one 8–9 hour clinical shift each, generating over 150.0 hours of real-time observation data quantifying physicians’ ED workflow. Physicians spent a median 34.1% of their shift using the computer and 26.9% with patients. Other activities included verbal communication with staff (15.9%), phone use (9.5%), miscellaneous tasks (5.5%), personal time (3.9%), electrocardiogram review (0.7%), and procedures (0.4%). EHR log analysis showed that physicians spent an additional median 1.3h (IQR 0.5–2.6) using the computer after their scheduled shifts, for a combined 29.8 minutes (IQR 25.6–38.5) on the computer per scheduled hour of their ED shift.

Conclusions:

Emergency physicians spent more than one-third of their ED shift working on the computer, which was more time than they spent with patients. They also spent 1–2 hours using the computer after their scheduled shift. These findings demonstrate the need for strategies to reduce unnecessary computer use during and after clinical shifts to enhance workflow efficiency and improve patient care.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Henreid AJ, Ioannides KL, Pevnick JM, Cohen TN, Torbati SS, Nuckols TK, Berdahl CT

Quantifying and Visualizing Emergency Physician Workflow: Observational Time-Motion Study

JMIR Med Inform 2026;14:e85983

DOI: 10.2196/85983

PMID: 42496179

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.