Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 13, 2025
Date Accepted: May 30, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Social Media Narratives on Affective and Behavioral Responses to Menopause Content: Randomized Online Experimental Study

Osborne A, Brown R, Sillence E

Effects of Social Media Narratives on Affective and Behavioral Responses to Menopause Content: Randomized Online Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e85788

DOI: 10.2196/85788

PMID: 42467962

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Social Media Narratives on Menopause: An Online Experiment

  • Alison Osborne; 
  • Richard Brown; 
  • Elizabeth Sillence

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social media is an increasingly prominent channel for communicating menopause information and experiences, yet the affective and behavioural consequences of different narrative framings remain unclear.

Objective:

We examined how distress, normalising and transformative narratives influence women’s immediate responses to menopause content online.

Methods:

In an online experiment, UK women aged 40-83 who were perimenopausal or post-menopausal (N = 737) were randomly assigned to view four anonymised and standardised social media posts reflecting one of three narratives: normal, distress or transformative. Participants then reported affective reactions, expected behavioural responses, and perceptions of the posts. Ordinal logistic regression models tested demographic predictors and condition effects, controlling for demographic factors.

Results:

Participants who viewed distress-framed posts reported greater levels of worry, confusion and anxiety, and reduced levels of reassurance, optimism and empowerment. Distress framing also increased perceived knowledge of menopause, despite participants feeling more negatively towards the posts. Neither distress nor transformative narratives influenced expected behavioural intentions to like, share, save, comment on, search for or discuss social media posts, compared to normal narratives. Post-menopausal status and older age were independently associated with less worry and anxiety. Participants rated distress and transformative posts as less representative of health professionals than normalising posts; transformative posts were also judged to be less representative of newspapers or TV.

Conclusions:

Narrative framing shaped immediate affect but not intended engagement with menopause content. As public discussion expands, diverse, balanced narratives may help reduce stigma and temper the disproportionate salience of negative framing. This study advances understanding of how narrative framing shapes responses to health content online.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Osborne A, Brown R, Sillence E

Effects of Social Media Narratives on Affective and Behavioral Responses to Menopause Content: Randomized Online Experimental Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e85788

DOI: 10.2196/85788

PMID: 42467962

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.