Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Date Submitted: Oct 11, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 13, 2025 - Dec 8, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Peer Assessment of Harmful Internet Use in Youth: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Dr Korczak’s Pediatric Principles
ABSTRACT
Background:
Harmful Internet Use (HIU) represents a growing concern, particularly among children and adolescents. While existing classifications such as Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5 and Gaming Disorder in the ICD-11 address specific internet-related behaviors, they fail to encompass the full spectrum of adverse consequences - including social withdrawal, impaired personal hygiene, and emotional dysregulation. Moreover, the tools commonly used to assess HIU, such as self-assessments or parental evaluations, lack reliability.
Objective:
This study introduces a novel approach inspired by Janusz Korczak’s educational philosophy, emphasizing the role of children as active participants in evaluating others within their age-proximal social group. The goal was to evaluate whether peer-based assessments yield more accurate insights into the prevalence and impact of HIU.
Methods:
A total of 104 Polish children evaluated 1038 children and adolescents using a 9-item rating scale. Items were scored on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 3, with intermediate values (0.5, 1.5, 2.5) permitted. Statistical analyses included frequency distributions to describe response patterns, Spearman’s rank correlations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses of summed scores (Q1–Q7) against severity ratings (Q8).
Results:
Approximately two-thirds of peer-reported evaluations indicated awareness of HIU, and over 60% rated the severity as moderate or high. Functional impacts such as social withdrawal and poorer school performance were commonly observed. All items were positively correlated, with Q8 strongly linked to Q2 and Q7. ROC analyses showed good discrimination between the lowest ratings (0/0.5) and the highest rating (3), while adjacent categories were more difficult to distinguish. SEM suggested that awareness and avoidance Peer assessment is a promising and more objective method for identifying HIU in youth populations. Given the increasing role of digital technology in children's lives, there is an urgent need for schools and mental health systems to adopt innovative tools that include participatory evaluation models rooted in respect and dialogue, as advocated by Korczak. of other activities predicted attempts to reduce HIU, while preference for HIU over socializing reduced them.
Conclusions:
Peer assessment is a promising and more objective method for identifying HIU in youth populations. Given the increasing role of digital technology in children's lives, there is an urgent need for schools and mental health systems to adopt innovative tools that include participatory evaluation models rooted in respect and dialogue, as advocated by Korczak.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.