Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Oct 8, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 8, 2025 - Dec 3, 2025
Date Accepted: Jun 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/85480

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Optimizing weblinks embedded within digital vaccination invitations to increase trust and booking intention: Experimental Evidence.

  • Claire M. Oakley; 
  • Hazel Sayer; 
  • Dawn Liu Holford; 
  • Wändi Bruine de Bruin; 
  • Gaëlle Vallée-Tourangeau; 
  • Tim Chadborn; 
  • Miroslav Sirota; 
  • Marie Juanchich

ABSTRACT

Background:

People are encouraged to respond swiftly to digital health invitations like vaccination prompts, but they are also encouraged to question the legitimacy of digital communications. This research focuses on an overlooked aspect of digital communication that can be leveraged to foster trust and user engagement: embedded weblinks.

Objective:

Drawing from digital communication theory and psychological science, we posited that fluent weblinks that are easy to read and transparently identify the healthcare provider will improve trust and user engagement.

Methods:

In three experiments (total N = 3,183), participants read a hypothetical email from the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) inviting them to book their COVID-19 vaccination by clicking a weblink. The control invitation included the weblink initially used by the UK's national COVID vaccination services. The control weblink is compared to a clear weblink (easy to read and easy to identify host) (Experiment 1 and 3) or to concealed weblinks: a text-embedded weblink and a shortened weblink (Experiment 2 and 3). Participants reported their trust in the invitation, their perceived readability of the weblink, who they thought the website host was, and their intention to book an appointment by clicking on the weblink.

Results:

Clear weblinks and text-embedded weblinks increased the identification of the host organization and were perceived as easier to read, which was associated with increased trust perception and booking intention. Shortened weblinks aided host identification but had a detrimental impact on perceived readability and did not increase trust perception or booking intention.

Conclusions:

Health-related digital communications should include readable weblinks with an identifiable host to foster trust and engagement. Where changing the weblink is impractical, concealing it via a text-embedded weblink is an effective alternative.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Oakley CM, Sayer H, Holford DL, Bruine de Bruin W, Vallée-Tourangeau G, Chadborn T, Sirota M, Juanchich M

Optimizing weblinks embedded within digital vaccination invitations to increase trust and booking intention: Experimental Evidence.

JMIR Preprints. 08/10/2025:85480

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.85480

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/85480

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.