Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Oct 7, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 30, 2025 - Dec 25, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Health beliefs of parents’ perspectives towards HPV vaccination: a qualitative study in Kuwait

  • Ahmad Abuzoor; 
  • Md Shafiqur Rahman Jabin; 
  • Cor Jonker

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the leading causes of female mortality after breast cancer. CC accounts for more than 7.5% of female cancer deaths worldwide. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in women and the leading cause of cervical cancer in women for almost 99% of all CC cases. HPV vaccination could prevent up to 70% of HPV-related cervical cancer and 90% of genital warts. HPV vaccination is the bedrock of primary prevention and helps reduce the incidence and death rates of HPV-associated cervical cancer. This analysis examines each theme based on responses to questions about HPV and HPV vaccine knowledge and health beliefs among Kuwaiti parents.

Objective:

The study aims to understand the knowledge and health beliefs of 20 Kuwaiti parents regarding HPV vaccination, with the goal of developing a health promotion policy and introducing a national immunization program in Kuwait.

Methods:

The remaining 37 participants were then evaluated using purposive sampling to select 20 participants for the one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The researcher wanted to include both participants (male and female parents) with primary education (diploma and below) and those with secondary and above education (Bachelor's and above). the researcher had four categories with sufficient numbers (at least five in each category), which gave us at least 20. Semi-structured interviews were held with individual parents based on the Health Belief Model (HBM). The data were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach, generating themes through the theoretical framework of the HBM, and theme extraction analyses were managed on a semantic level.

Results:

There are seven main themes containing 20 sub-themes. Seven themes are: (1) Knowledge and awareness about HPV infection and vaccine. (2) Perceived susceptibility, which is explained by the HPV infection effect based on gender. (3) Perceived barriers to HPV vaccination with several sub-themes: stigma, social customs, negative vaccination uptake, and religious influences. (4) Perceived benefits: Parents emphasise the benefits of getting an HPV vaccine, such as protection against the virus and related cancer diseases. (5) Perceived severity, a fear of getting a severe disease. (6) Self-efficacy, with sub-themes of parent experiences decisions regarding HPV vaccination (7) Cues-to-action, the role of the Ministry of Health, and (HCPs).

Conclusions:

The HBM framework is beneficial for Kuwait's HPV vaccination campaign. The correlation between sexual intercourse and the HPV vaccine frequently adds complexity to the decision-making process about immunisation. This study demonstrates that positive cues to action from HCPs and educational vaccination benefits can overcome perceived barriers among parents related to stigma and religion. It is essential to conduct such research to guide the development of interventions aimed at promoting the adoption of the HPV vaccine uptake.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Abuzoor A, Jabin MSR, Jonker C

Health beliefs of parents’ perspectives towards HPV vaccination: a qualitative study in Kuwait

JMIR Preprints. 07/10/2025:85438

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.85438

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/85438

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.