JMIR Publications

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digital health tools, including patient portals, telemedicine, or mobile health apps, are increasingly core to healthcare. Digital readiness, encompassing both digital access and literacy, is crucial for enabling patients to effectively engage with the increasing number of digital health tools. Despite growing recognition of digital readiness as a health-related social need, little is known about digital readiness screening practices.

Objective:

To assess the extent of digital readiness screening and the organizational factors associated with screening.

Methods:

From January-May 2024, we administered an online survey to a convenience sample of clinicians or informatics leaders from U.S. healthcare systems. Our primary outcome was whether the respondent reported that their organization screened for digital readiness (yes vs no), and the secondary outcome was self-reported barriers to screening. We asked respondents to report characteristics related to their health system, including health system type, geographic area, payors accepted, patient population characteristics, health-related social needs screening practices (eg, screen for food insecurity), and awareness of digital inclusion policies/programs. Using bivariate logistic regression models, we examined organizational characteristics associated with screening for digital readiness.

Results:

Of 144 respondents, 64 (44%) reported screening patients for digital readiness. Organizations serving uninsured patients had lower odds of screening (OR=0.32; 95% CI=0.14-0.72). Less than half (47%) were familiar with any digital readiness-related policy, but screening was more likely when respondents were familiar with at least one policy/program promoting equitable digital readiness (OR=6.6; 95% CI=2.4-20.6). Screening for other health-related social needs was not associated with digital readiness screening. The most frequently cited barriers to screening for digital readiness were lack of resources to address digital access (45%), lack of resources to implement screening (42%), and lack of time (41%).

Conclusions:

Digital readiness screening has limited adoption in U.S. healthcare systems, particularly in settings serving the populations most likely to experience challenges with digital access or literacy. Health systems that screen for other health-related social needs are also not more likely to screen for digital readiness. The limited adoption of digital readiness screening likely reflects lower awareness of digital readiness as a social need and a lack of infrastructure to support its uptake, such as standardized screening questions or a trained workforce on how to screen for and intervene on barriers to digital readiness. Low awareness of the digital equity policies that might incentivize digital readiness screening further hinders adoption. Without increased adoption of digital readiness screening and/or interventions to mitigate barriers to digital readiness, digital health tools are unlikely to be accessible to or benefit all populations. Multi-level interventions, including policy changes and workforce training, are likely necessary to increase the adoption of digital readiness screening and mitigation efforts that address barriers to digital exclusion.