Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Dec 08, 2025)
Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 26, 2025 - Dec 21, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Trauma-Informed Conversational Agents for Mental Health: Understanding User Perspectives and Experiences
ABSTRACT
Background:
Mental health Conversational Agents (MHCAs), or chatbots, are increasingly used to provide accessible, scalable support for individuals experiencing psychological distress. While these tools, whether AI-driven or scripted, hold promise for expanding mental health care, concerns remain regarding their safety, responsiveness, and appropriateness, especially for trauma-exposed users. Trauma-informed care (TIC), a well-established framework in in-person therapy, emphasizes safety, trust, empowerment, collaboration, peer support, and cultural sensitivity. However, little is understood about how users interpret and prioritize TIC principles when engaging with chatbot-based mental health support.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore 1) how users conceptualize trauma-informed care in the context of mental health chatbots and 2) what factors can help us to predict whether users perceive their chatbot interaction as trauma-informed.
Methods:
A web-based, self-administered survey (REDCap) was completed by 606 participants recruited via ClickWorker, social media, and MyChart. The 59-item survey (multiple response questions, Likert Scale, open-ended) assessed demographics, technology use, adverse life experiences, chatbot use, and perceptions of TIC and satisfaction with MHCAs. To identify latent domains representing how participants structure their understanding of TIC in conversational agents' contexts, Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted. To identify factors to predict trauma-informed interaction, multivariable logistic regression models were used.
Results:
Participants reported high overall satisfaction (84.5%) and high trauma-informed perception (92.9%) of their chatbot experience. Factor analyses yielded a validated five-domain structure: Trust & Transparency, Data Safety, Empowerment, Peer Support, and Cultural Sensitivity, with excellent model fit (CFI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.045). Regression analyses identified Trust (OR = 3.89, p = .001), Empowerment (OR = 1.97, p = .025), and Peer Support (OR = 1.73, p = .021) as significant positive predictors of TIC perception. In contrast, citing convenience as a primary use reason (OR = 0.33, p =.041) and higher smartphone proficiency (OR = 0.38, p = .033) were negatively associated with TIC perception.
Conclusions:
This study offers an empirical foundation for defining and measuring trauma-informed design in mental health conversational agents. Key TIC features such as trust-building, emotional validation, and peer connection significantly shape user perceptions. Results underscore the need for AI-based mental health tools to align with trauma-informed principles and adapt to diverse user expectations to enhance therapeutic safety, credibility, and inclusivity.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.