Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Nov 3, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 6, 2025 - Jan 1, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Interprofessional Training in Virtual Reality for Health Care: An Experimental Study on Procedural Knowledge and Willingness to Collaborate
ABSTRACT
Background:
High-quality wound care requires early and effective interprofessional collaboration between medical, nursing, and pharmacy professionals. However, interprofessional education (IPE) in this context remains limited in higher education. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) seems to be a promising IPE tool, enabling a standardized, realistic, and safe learning environment that allows multiple learners from different professions to train together. However, its educational effectiveness depends on an instructional design that supports learning while managing cognitive demands during immersive experiences.
Objective:
This study examined whether a newly developed interprofessional iVR wound-care training improves (1) procedural knowledge and (2) willingness to collaborate among medical, nursing, and pharmacy students, and how cognitive load relates to these outcomes.
Methods:
A within-subjects design with a pre- and posttest was implemented with 116 students from medicine, nursing, and pharmacy. Students completed two iVR sessions (~25 and 15 minutes) in interprofessional triads, addressing a pressure-ulcer case. The training integrated step-by-step scaffolding for the wound care task, and collaboration scripts to guide teamwork. Procedural knowledge and willingness to collaborate were assessed before and after the sessions, and cognitive load was measured after the sessions. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANCOVAs and a mediation model to test the preregistered effects.
Results:
Procedural knowledge increased significantly from pre- to posttest, F(1,107) = 26.19, p < .001, η² = .08. Cognitive load showed no significant effect on this gain. Willingness to collaborate did not change after the first session, F(1,80) = 3.55, p = .063, η² = .01, and was unaffected by cognitive load. Exploratory analyses showed that willingness to collaborate was significantly higher after the second session, t(64) = 3.16, p = .007, mean difference = 0.202). The effect on procedural knowledge and willingness to collaborate did not depend on the learner’s profession.
Conclusions:
These findings suggest that the iVR training effectively supported learning by providing clear structure and managing cognitive demands, enabling students from different professions to acquire procedural knowledge without being hindered by excessive cognitive load. The absence of cognitive load effects indicates that the instructional design, combining scaffolding and collaboration scripts, successfully balanced task complexity and guidance within the immersive environment. The delayed increase in collaboration willingness further suggests that attitudinal change requires sustained, repeated engagement in interprofessional contexts rather than a single exposure. Notably, no profession-related differences emerged in either procedural knowledge or willingness to collaborate, indicating that the iVR training supported learners equally across professional backgrounds. Overall, the results highlight the potential of iVR as a scalable, theory-based approach to IPE that can bridge disciplinary boundaries and prepare learners for effective teamwork in clinical practice.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.