Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Sep 29, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 8, 2025

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation

Platt K, Franklin S, Sumner C, Case S

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e85028

DOI: 10.2196/85028

PMID: 41529253

PMCID: 12848492

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: A Multicohort Evaluation

  • Kristen Platt; 
  • Samuel Franklin; 
  • Caroline Sumner; 
  • Sami Case

ABSTRACT

Background:

BACKGROUND: As medical and allied health curricula adapt to increasing time constraints, ethical considerations, and resource limitations, digital innovations are becoming vital supplements to cadaver-based anatomy instruction. While prior studies have examined the effectiveness of prosection versus dissection and the role of digital tools in anatomy learning, few resources align interactive digital modules directly with hands-on prosection experiences.

Objective:

OBJECTIVE: This project addresses that gap by introducing an integrated, curriculum-aligned platform for self-guided anatomy learning.

Methods:

METHODS: We created Anatomy Interactives, a web-based laboratory manual structured to complement cadaveric prosection labs for MD, DPT, and PA students. Modules were developed using iSpring Suite and included interactive labeled images, donor photographs, and quiz-style self-assessments. Learners engaged with modules before, during, or after laboratory sessions. PA/DPT and MD students completed post-course surveys evaluating module use and perceived impact. MD student exam scores from a 2023 cohort (no module access) were compared to a 2024 cohort (with access) to evaluate effectiveness.

Results:

RESULTS: A total of 147 students completed the survey (31 PA/DPT and 116 MD). The majority reported using modules 1–2 hours per week and found them helpful for both written and laboratory exams. MD students in the 2024 cohort performed better on all three exams compared to the 2023 cohort, with two exam mean differences reaching statistical significance (P<.05, t-test). Qualitative feedback highlighted accessibility, content reinforcement, and user engagement as key benefits.

Conclusions:

CONCLUSION: Interactive modules integrated with prosection labs enhanced learner engagement and performance. This hybrid digital-cadaveric model shows promise for scalable, learner-centered gross anatomy education.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Platt K, Franklin S, Sumner C, Case S

Interactive, Image-Based Modules as a Complement to Prosection-Based Anatomy Laboratories: Multicohort Evaluation

JMIR Med Educ 2026;12:e85028

DOI: 10.2196/85028

PMID: 41529253

PMCID: 12848492

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.