Currently submitted to: Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Date Submitted: Sep 27, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 2, 2025 - Nov 27, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Generosity as a Scientific Method: Building Knowledge and Community in a Competitive World
ABSTRACT
Generosity can function as a scientific method: a disciplined stance that aligns curiosity with openness, credit‑sharing, and stewardship of data, specimens, and ideas. Rather than a soft add‑on, generosity structures how questions are framed, teams are built, and results are disseminated, thereby improving rigor, reproducibility, and impact. I examine generosity as practice at the levels of people, collectives, and institutions, and argue that persistent global challenges in health demand pro‑collaborative architectures. Seen this way, generosity is not mere altruism; it is part of the epistemic engine that turns uncertainty into shared knowledge while distributing opportunity and recognition more fairly. I outline practical principles for embedding generosity into research design, governance, and evaluation, and discuss how these principles can counter vanity metrics and short‑term incentives. I conclude that embedding generosity in the infrastructure of science enables better questions, faster learning, and greater public value.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.