Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 24, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 27, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Smartphone‑versus‑Headset Speech‑Feature Pipelines: An Exploratory Study in Healthy Adults

  • Emil Svoboda; 
  • Andrzej Marciniak; 
  • Alfredo Morales Pinzon; 
  • Tomáš Bořil; 
  • Noriaki Wada; 
  • Boyan Alexandrov; 
  • Hiroto Hatabu; 
  • Charles R.G. Guttmann; 
  • Vladimir I. Valtchinov

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We aim to create and compare two digital-health pipelines for voice recording and speech analyses based on smartphones and professional recording equipment. We benchmark the quality of the smartphone recordings on speech features previously shown to be predictive of neurological impairment. Approach: A mobile phone app that records a user performing three speech tasks on the smartphone’s built-in microphone is developed. Simultaneously they are recorded using professional recording equipment. Speech features are extracted and compared across each recording pair. Speakers performed three speech tasks – reading a text, repeating syllables for 20 seconds, and sustaining a vowel. Bland-Altman visualization, Deming regression, correlation tests (Spearman, Intraclass) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were utilized to assess concordance degree across devices. Dotplots and standard deviation across speaker and across time were used to assess longitudinal stability. Signal-to-Noise ratios were utilized to assess inter-and-within-rater reproducibility. The robustness of the features over time was assessed by the relative size of differences between speakers and measurement error and profiling the reproducibility of the measurements in a test-retest scenario.

Results:

A corpus of 20 recording sessions was collected from 3 speakers, with one speaker recording 6 sessions spanning 5 months. Twenty-three speech features served as a basis for assessing concordance between recording pairs. 19/23 (80%) features were found to be significantly correlated across recording methods; 10/23 (43%) features have statistically-significant p-values. The smartphone’s noise-cancellation seems to be affecting some features. Most features (14/23, 63%) are longitudinally unstable.

Conclusions:

A voice recording and speech analyses pipeline using a smartphone appears potentially capable of capturing the essential variability of the speech features used for establishing and validating speech biomarkers. Device-dependent noise-reduciton algorithms deployed in modern smartphones need to be handled with care. Much-larger-N Case-Control studies are needed to validate and extend these preliminary findings to clinical setting and across specific neurological disease states.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Svoboda E, Marciniak A, Pinzon AM, Bořil T, Wada N, Alexandrov B, Hatabu H, Guttmann CR, Valtchinov VI

Smartphone‑versus‑Headset Speech‑Feature Pipelines: An Exploratory Study in Healthy Adults

JMIR Preprints. 24/09/2025:84773

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.84773

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/84773

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.