Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Sep 24, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 15, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 21, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children’s Use of Technology: Systematic Review

Lund Rasmussen C, Pui Hung Au I, Hendry D, Beynon A, Stearne S, Thomas G, Mannell K, Kervin L, Edwards S, Harris C, Straker L, Zabatiero J

Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children’s Use of Technology: Systematic Review

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2026;9:e84712

DOI: 10.2196/84712

PMID: 42275449

Questionnaires used to explore the perspectives of parents and health professionals on young children’s use of technology: A systematic review

  • Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; 
  • Ivan Pui Hung Au; 
  • Danica Hendry; 
  • Amber Beynon; 
  • Sarah Stearne; 
  • George Thomas; 
  • Kate Mannell; 
  • Lisa Kervin; 
  • Susan Edwards; 
  • Courtenay Harris; 
  • Leon Straker; 
  • Juliana Zabatiero

ABSTRACT

Background:

Technology is integrated into children’s daily lives, with parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives shaping children’s technology use. Measuring and understanding these perspectives is essential for developing strategies for supporting adults in decision-making that help children thrive in a digital world.

Objective:

This systematic review aimed to investigate questionnaires that have been used to assess parents’ and health professionals’ perspectives on young children’s use of technology related to health, wellbeing, and development. The secondary aim was to synthesize findings on these perspectives.

Methods:

Peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and September 2024 were identified through searches in seven electronic databases. Studies were included if they examined parental or healthcare professionals’ perspectives on technology use among children aged birth-5 years. Two reviewers independently conducted the data extraction and quality assessment. Deductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore the content focus of the questionnaire used in the included studies and synthesise the reported perspectives.

Results:

Eighty-five studies were included, all involving parents. No study investigated health professionals’ perspectives. The methodological quality of questionnaires used was generally low and only 39 studies reported psychometric properties of the questionnaires used. Of these, 15 studies reported more than one measure of validity or reliability. Seventy-five studies reported participants’ perspectives on children’s technology use. Findings revealed that parents generally supported the role of digital devices in enhancing learning but expressed concerns about potential negative impacts on children’s physical health, emotions, and behaviours.

Conclusions:

Parents’ perspectives on children’s technology use are frequently assessed through questionnaires, though the quality of these questionnaires was often poor, with limited psychometric testing. Parental perspectives were mixed with educational benefits being recognised but countered with concerns about the impact on children’s physical health and development. High-quality tools are needed to generate stronger evidence informing strategies to support families in technology decision-making with children.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lund Rasmussen C, Pui Hung Au I, Hendry D, Beynon A, Stearne S, Thomas G, Mannell K, Kervin L, Edwards S, Harris C, Straker L, Zabatiero J

Questionnaires Used to Explore the Perspectives of Parents and Health Professionals on Young Children’s Use of Technology: Systematic Review

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2026;9:e84712

DOI: 10.2196/84712

PMID: 42275449

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.