Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 23, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 30, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
Date Accepted: Apr 14, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Examining Sensory Systems That Contribute to Falls in Parkinson Disease Using Computerized Dynamic Posturography: Secondary Analysis

Rivera M

Examining Sensory Systems That Contribute to Falls in Parkinson Disease Using Computerized Dynamic Posturography: Secondary Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84659

DOI: 10.2196/84659

PMID: 42096603

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Examining Sensory Systems that Contribute to Falls in Parkinson’s disease using Computerized Dynamic Posturography: A Secondary Analysis

  • Monica Rivera

ABSTRACT

Background:

Falls in PD are a complex, multifactorial entity that involves motor, non-motor, environmental, and cognitive factors. While the environmental, cognitive, and motor factors that contribute to falls in PD are well-documented, there are limited investigations into the sensory systems that also contribute to falls.

Objective:

The study’s purpose is to determine whether any of the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) conditions or composite scores are associated with falls in people with PD.

Methods:

The study was a secondary analysis of interventions studies in people with Parkinson's disease aimed at reducing falls and improving mobility. This analysis was to examine correlations between the SOT variables (Conditions 1-6 and composite scores) and the number of falls. Further analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test to determine if there were differences amongst fall groups and SOT variables).

Results:

Data from 40 participants were included in the study, 24 males and 16 females with a mean age of 68.9 (SD 8.1). Spearman rank correlations found significant negative correlations between the number of falls and SOT Condition (P <.05). Condition 1 (ρ = -.331), Condition 2 (ρ = -.512), and Condition 3 (ρ = -.462). A Kruskal-Wallis test documented a significant group effect between the fall group and Condition 2, (χ2 = 8.434, P = .015) and Condition 3, (χ2= 8.708, P =.013).

Conclusions:

SOT Condition 2 and 3 were the variables that showed an association with falls in this cohort. The literature indicates that the vestibular system contributes to postural instability; however, it may be that the early decline of the vestibular system, combined with the later decline of the visual system, leads to falls in PD. Readers should exercise caution regarding the results because of the small sample size and the inclusion of only sensory variables. Further investigations should continue on the sensory contributions to falls in PD and in particular. SOT Condition 2. Clinical Trial: n/a


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rivera M

Examining Sensory Systems That Contribute to Falls in Parkinson Disease Using Computerized Dynamic Posturography: Secondary Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84659

DOI: 10.2196/84659

PMID: 42096603

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.