Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 23, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 24, 2025 - Nov 19, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 23, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Dec 23, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Factors Influencing Continuance Intention for Online Consultations Among Survivors of Cancer: Grounded Theory Study

Yao Y, Zhang M, Peng S, Cheng Z, Duan Y

Factors Influencing Continuance Intention for Online Consultations Among Survivors of Cancer: Grounded Theory Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e84644

DOI: 10.2196/84644

PMID: 41432715

PMCID: 12824571

Influencing factors of continuance intention of online consultation among cancer survivors: Grounded theory study

  • Yutang Yao; 
  • Musi Zhang; 
  • Shanshan Peng; 
  • Zhuzhong Cheng; 
  • Yun Duan

ABSTRACT

Background:

Online consultation platforms have become an important component of cancer survivorship care, particularly in contexts where survivors require long-term follow-up and reassurance. While adoption increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence on the factors influencing continued utilization among cancer survivors remains limited, especially in China.

Objective:

This study aimed to explore the influencing factors of continued utilization of online consultation among cancer survivors in Southwest China and to develop a grounded theoretical model explaining continuance intention.

Methods:

A grounded theory qualitative design was employed. Twenty-six cancer survivors with diverse cancer types, treatment stages, and demographic characteristics were recruited from the Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute and affiliated institutions. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.

Results:

Six interrelated domains influenced survivors’ continued use of online consultation platforms: platform quality, physician competence, user perception, individual condition, external context, and privacy concerns. User perception mediated the impact of platform quality and physician competence, while individual condition and external context exerted both direct and indirect influences. Privacy concerns acted as a moderator, as survivors weighed perceived benefits against risks of disclosure. The final theoretical model positioned continuance intention at the center of these interconnected domains, reflecting survivors’ negotiation between technological features, relational care, personal health status, family involvement, and privacy considerations.

Conclusions:

Cancer survivors’ willingness to continue using online consultation depends on multiple interrelated factors beyond technological usability. Sustained engagement is shaped by survivors’ perceptions of usefulness and trust, physician empathy and timeliness, family encouragement, and acceptance of privacy trade-offs. The theoretical model advances understanding of digital health continuance in oncology and offers practical guidance for developing survivor-centered online consultation services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yao Y, Zhang M, Peng S, Cheng Z, Duan Y

Factors Influencing Continuance Intention for Online Consultations Among Survivors of Cancer: Grounded Theory Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e84644

DOI: 10.2196/84644

PMID: 41432715

PMCID: 12824571

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.