Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jul 13, 2017
Date Accepted: Oct 30, 2017
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The QardioArm App in the Assessment of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Reliability and Validity Study

Mazoteras Pardo V, Losa Iglesias ME, López Chicharro J, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R

The QardioArm App in the Assessment of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Reliability and Validity Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5(12):e198

DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8458

PMID: 29246880

PMCID: 5747597

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The QardioArm App in the Assessment of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Reliability and Validity Study

  • Victoria Mazoteras Pardo; 
  • Marta E Losa Iglesias; 
  • José López Chicharro; 
  • Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo

Background:

Self-measurement of blood pressure is a priority strategy for managing blood pressure.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of blood pressure and heart rate following the European Society of Hypertension’s international validation protocol, as measured with the QardioArm, a fully automatic, noninvasive wireless blood pressure monitor and mobile app.

Methods:

A total of 100 healthy volunteers older than 25 years from the general population of Ciudad Real, Spain, participated in a test-retest validation study with two measurement sessions separated by 5 to 7 days. In each measurement session, seven systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate assessments were taken, alternating between the two devices. The test device was the QardioArm and the previously validated criterion device was the Omron M3. Sessions took place at a single study site with an evaluation room that was maintained at an appropriate temperature and kept free from noises and distractions.

Results:

The QardioArm displayed very consistent readings both within and across sessions (intraclass correlation coefficients=0.80-0.95, standard errors of measurement=2.5-5.4). The QardioArm measurements corresponded closely to those from the criterion device (r>.96) and mean values for the two devices were nearly identical. The QardioArm easily passed all validation standards set by the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.

Conclusions:

The QardioArm mobile app has validity and it can be used free of major measurement error.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Mazoteras Pardo V, Losa Iglesias ME, López Chicharro J, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R

The QardioArm App in the Assessment of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate: Reliability and Validity Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5(12):e198

DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8458

PMID: 29246880

PMCID: 5747597

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.