Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Feb 26, 2026)
Date Submitted: Sep 22, 2025
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Representations of mpox by healthcare professionals and scientists on TikTok: a qualitative analysis of TikTok content and comments
ABSTRACT
Background:
Social media is widely used to communicate concerns and information about health-related issues. TikTok is one of the most popular platforms worldwide, especially among younger people. There is a paucity of data on its role during infectious disease outbreaks.
Objective:
We describe TikToks made by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and scientists in response to the 2022 clade IIb mpox outbreak, as well as audience engagement.
Methods:
We conducted a search of TikTok in February 2024 using “monkey pox”, “monkeypox” and “mpox”, recording the top 50 TikToks for each term. We deduplicated this dataset and collected information on engagement (e.g. number of views, comments and likes), as well as content and composition, using a standardised Excel data extraction form designed to captureWe identified twenty-six TikToks by content creators who described themselves as HCPs or scientists. Almost all provided information about mpox and two described the creator’s lived experience of mpox. Avoiding stigma was a key focus; creators often emphasised that anyone could be at risk of mpox acquisition, rather than explicitly linking mpox transmission to sex between men (despite this group being disproportionately impacted during the clade IIb outbreak). A large number of comments on these TikToks were questions about mpox, or reinforced or attempted to mitigate stigma. sound, text and visual aspects of the platform. We conducted a thematic analysis of TikToks and comments.
Results:
We identified twenty-six TikToks by content creators who described themselves as HCPs or scientists. Almost all provided information about mpox and two described the creator’s lived experience of mpox. Avoiding stigma was a key focus; creators often emphasised that anyone could be at risk of mpox acquisition, rather than explicitly linking mpox transmission to sex between men (despite this group being disproportionately impacted during the clade IIb outbreak). A large number of comments on these TikToks were questions about mpox, or reinforced or attempted to mitigate stigma.
Conclusions:
HCPs and scientists leveraged TikTok to provide information on mpox, whilst making efforts to minimise stigma. Online platforms such as TikTok are key sites for public health messaging during infectious disease outbreaks, with potential to reach younger populations. Our study contributes to the emergent literature on methodological approaches to TikTok analysis for public health research.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.