Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)

Date Submitted: Sep 18, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 3, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Enhancing Older Adults Well-Being Through VR-Assisted Creative Arts: A Scoping Review

  • XIE JIAN; 
  • NAZLENA MOHAMAD ALI; 
  • MOHAMAD TAHA IJAB

ABSTRACT

Background:

The rapid aging of global populations highlights the need for innovative interventions to enhance the well-being of older adults;VR-assisted art provides a new platform.

Objective:

This scoping review aims to systematically map and evaluate the application of VR-assisted art creation in enhancing the well-being of older adults, with a focus on its impacts on physical, mental, and social connections, as well as the challenges and supports encountered during implementation.

Methods:

Following the methodological framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this review specifically examines VR-assisted artistic activities among adults aged 60 years and above. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the ACM Digital Library for studies published from January 2015 to January 2025. A total of 1609 records were screened, and 14 eligible studies were included.

Results:

Across the 14 included studies, VR-based art interventions consistently produced multidimensional benefits. Randomized trials showed notable motor rehabilitation gains, such as Barthel Index improvements exceeding 40% and a reduction in spasticity [35]. Emotion regulation significantly improved through immersive art applications,with depressive symptoms decreasing by 27–32% for up to two months [27]. Multi-user VR environments increased social connectedness, as 57% of participants reported enhanced social support [19]. Neurophysiological data suggest neuroplasticity, showing cortical activation increases up to 38% [22], while immersion levels remained high, with flow states averaging 7–9/10 (Figure 2). However, challenges including device discomfort, cost, and limited cultural adaptation were reported (Table 4), underscoring the need for longitudinal studies, culturally responsive designs, and standardized evaluations to enhance generalizability and scalability.

Conclusions:

Future research should prioritize the development of cost-effective, age-friendly VR solutions, the establishment of robust theoretical models, and the creation of scalable frameworks to maximize VR’s potential in promoting healthy aging and social innovation. This review integrates empirical evidence with practical insights and advocates interdisciplinary collaboration to address the diverse needs of aging populations through VR technology. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

JIAN X, MOHAMAD ALI N, IJAB MT

Enhancing Older Adults Well-Being Through VR-Assisted Creative Arts: A Scoping Review

JMIR Preprints. 18/09/2025:84374

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.84374

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/84374

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.