Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Sep 14, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 14, 2025 - Nov 9, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 24, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evidence on Learning Style Preferences Among Clinical Students in Nigeria Using the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic Model: Cross-Sectional Study

Rotifa SU, Awotua-Efebo EB, Owapiriba PA, Adesina AD, Abisoye OS, Raimi AaG, Elemuwa CO, Raimi MO, Oginifolunnia OC

Evidence on Learning Style Preferences Among Clinical Students in Nigeria Using the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic Model: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84089

DOI: 10.2196/84089

PMID: 42430124

Learning Style Preferences Among Clinical Students in Nigeria: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study Using the VARK Model

  • Stella Ufuoma Rotifa; 
  • Ebi Bio Awotua-Efebo; 
  • Prayer Abu Owapiriba; 
  • Adedotun Daniel Adesina; 
  • Oyeyemi Sunday Abisoye; 
  • Aziba-anyam Gift Raimi; 
  • Christopher Ononiwu Elemuwa; 
  • Morufu Olalekan Raimi; 
  • Okechukwu Christian Oginifolunnia

ABSTRACT

Background:

Understanding how medical students learn is critical for improving teaching strategies in clinical education. Despite the widespread use of learning style frameworks such as the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) model, there is limited evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, and the utility of these approaches remains contested.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the predominant learning style preferences of clinical students at a Nigerian medical school and to examine how demographic and academic factors influence these preferences.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 clinical students (400–600 level) at Niger Delta University using the validated VARK inventory (version 7.8). Descriptive statistics summarized learning style distributions, and chi-square tests assessed associations with gender, age, and year of study. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results:

Of 200 participants (mean age 25.1 years, SD 3.9; 107/200, 53.5% male), 105 (52.5%) preferred unimodal learning and 95 (47.5%) multimodal. Kinesthetic (121/200, 60.5%) and auditory (110/200, 55.0%) were the most common dominant preferences, followed by read/write (68/200, 34.0%) and visual (36/200, 18.0%). Gender was significantly associated with visual preference (χ² = 4.49, P = .034), which was higher among males. Age showed no significant association with learning styles (P > .05). Year of study was significantly associated with read/write preference (χ² = 8.29, P = .016).

Conclusions:

Clinical students in this Nigerian setting predominantly favored kinesthetic and auditory learning, with nearly half reporting multimodal preferences. Medical educators should adopt blended instructional strategies such as clinical simulations, bedside teaching, small-group discussions, and audio-visual resources to accommodate diverse learning needs and enhance engagement. This study expands evidence on learning preferences among medical students in sub-Saharan Africa. By integrating interactive, multimodal approaches into the curriculum, medical schools can foster inclusive learning environments and better prepare students for professional practice.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Rotifa SU, Awotua-Efebo EB, Owapiriba PA, Adesina AD, Abisoye OS, Raimi AaG, Elemuwa CO, Raimi MO, Oginifolunnia OC

Evidence on Learning Style Preferences Among Clinical Students in Nigeria Using the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic Model: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e84089

DOI: 10.2196/84089

PMID: 42430124

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.