Currently accepted at: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Sep 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 15, 2025 - Nov 10, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 19, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.
It will appear shortly on 10.2196/84030
The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.
Identifying evidence-based strategies in a digital mental health intervention for depression: A qualitative content analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Worldwide, depression is a leading cause of disability, and its prevalence continues to rise. Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment, access to traditional face-to-face CBT is limited due to clinician availability and access barriers. Evidence-based digital interventions offer an alternative, but few document how closely they adhere to established therapeutic protocols. Understanding the content included in these apps helps researchers and clinicians understand mechanisms of action, whether they follow best practices, and how they might be improved.
Objective:
This study aims to identify and summarize evidence-based techniques in a validated, commercially available smartphone-based CBT intervention for depression, Mindset.
Methods:
Using standardized CBT strategy definitions and the Behavior Change Taxonomy (BCT) version 1 (BCTTv1), we coded all 393 app pages to identify the presence and distribution of therapeutic techniques. Coders used a collaborative consensus process, and interrater agreement was calculated
Results:
All 16 CBT techniques were identified in Mindset, with 528 instances coded across modules. Psychoeducation, skill building, and cognitive restructuring were most frequently applied. BCT coding found 37 of 93 possible techniques across 13 of 16 BCTTv1 categories, with shaping knowledge, repetition and substitution, and feedback and monitoring most prevalent.
Conclusions:
Identifying CBT techniques and BCTs in a digital intervention provides transparency about embedded evidence-based strategies and their implementation. Findings show BCTs align with core CBT principles and that complete representation of all BCTs may not be necessary for therapeutic benefit. Using a standardized framework can help describe interventions systematically to support hypothesis generation, evaluation, and refinement.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.