Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 12, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 16, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Key Design Considerations for Digital Work Stress Interventions: Content Analysis & Narrative Synthesis

  • Leo Kowalski; 
  • Anna Finnes; 
  • Sabine Koch; 
  • Aleksandra Bujacz

ABSTRACT

Background:

Work-related stress is a pervasive issue with significant implications for individual well-being, organizational productivity, and societal costs. Preventive interventions are a promising avenue for mitigating the negative health consequences of stress. More specifically, Digital Behavior Change Interventions (DBCIs) offer a scalable means of support that can be made widely available. However, evidence-based design guidelines specifically tailored for DBCIs targeting work stress are needed to support development efforts and enhance intervention quality.

Objective:

The primary aim was to identify key features in digital interventions for work stress to develop practical guidelines for intervention development.

Methods:

A deductive content analysis identified key features in peer-reviewed mental health interventions to inform recommended guidelines. Interventions were included for analysis based on being digital interventions targeting mental health for an overall healthy population. Interventions with better documentation (e.g., more detailed Methods sections describing the intervention) were prioritized. Selected interventions were subsequently analyzed by coding and mapping features using the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy and the Persuasive System Design (PSD) framework. A narrative synthesis approach was used to integrate and interpret findings across the reviewed interventions.

Results:

Ten interventions were included for analysis. The analysis revealed that many features in the reviewed applications could be coded according to the BCT taxonomy and PSD framework. Self-monitoring, prompting, and personalization features were the most common while features related to goal setting, rewards and social support were less frequently observed. Some intervention features integrated several BCTs and PSD principles within the same feature.

Conclusions:

We propose key design guidelines for developing more effective DBCIs for work stress. These include: (1) continuing to leverage core synergistic features such as self-monitoring, prompting, and personalization; (2) including underutilized features like goal setting and reward functions which can be smoothly integrated within common intervention formats, (3) embedding scalable social support, for instance by connecting co-workers with each other, (4) developing features that activate several behavioral mechanisms. Adhering to these guidelines may help optimize DBCIs for improved user engagement and intervention outcomes.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kowalski L, Finnes A, Koch S, Bujacz A

Key Design Considerations for Digital Work Stress Interventions: Content Analysis & Narrative Synthesis

JMIR Preprints. 12/09/2025:83753

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.83753

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/83753

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.