Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 8, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 9, 2025 - Nov 4, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Using Google Takeout Donations for Suicide Prevention Research: Study Design and Lessons Learned

  • Katherine Anne Comtois; 
  • Payton Smythe; 
  • Amanda Kerbrat; 
  • Ethan Hyungkeun Kim; 
  • Natalie Crouch; 
  • Ava Homiar; 
  • Brittany Ann Mosser; 
  • Nichole Sams; 
  • Michelle L. Harvey; 
  • Courtney L. Bagge; 
  • Trevor Cohen; 
  • Patricia A Arean

ABSTRACT

Background:

Social media and search engine tech companies, such as Google, use the wealth of data at their disposal to create algorithms to predict suicide risk, and provide interventions based on company policies and outputs from these algorithms. Neither the details of these algorithms or their accuracy in risk prediction are shared with the public, thus research is needed to verify whether algorithms applied to search engine data can accurately predict suicide risk in a platform user. The onus is on researchers to study the utility of these data for prediction, which requires donation of search data from people with lived experience of suicidal thoughts and behavior. There is little guidance, however, from the research community or tech companies as to how to best assist participants in sharing their data easily and securely.

Objective:

This paper describes study methods and experiences recruiting and retaining participants in a year long, fully remote prospective study of suicide prediction in people with variable risk for suicide, using Google Search data.

Methods:

We have recruited 485 United States dwelling and English-speaking adults who fall into one of 3 categories: participants with a suicide attempt in the past year, participants with a lifetime suicide attempt but not one in the past year, and participants with no lifetime suicide attempt.

Results:

We describe important data supporting the methods we used to recruit a remote sample of participants with risk for suicide, Google Search data quality, amount of fraudulent acting, and retention at each study phase and follow up assessment.

Conclusions:

Despite past success with remote clinical research methods, we found that recruitment can be significantly hampered by fraudulent acting, despite the use of state-of-the-art methods to mitigate this problem. Further, the ability to acquire useful Google Search data is extremely challenging and necessitates the use of technical assistance and continuous monitoring of Google’s Takeout data structure to ensure accurate data downloads. The solutions we provide for this type of research should be helpful for future endeavors. However, research is still limited by the barriers to obtaining data from technology companies. Clinical Trial: Not applicable – not a clinical trial


 Citation

Please cite as:

Comtois KA, Smythe P, Kerbrat A, Kim EH, Crouch N, Homiar A, Mosser BA, Sams N, Harvey ML, Bagge CL, Cohen T, Arean PA

Using Google Takeout Donations for Suicide Prevention Research: Study Design and Lessons Learned

JMIR Preprints. 08/09/2025:83637

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.83637

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/83637

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.