Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Aging

Date Submitted: Sep 4, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 11, 2026
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 18, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Smartphone-Based Field Assessment of Trunk Stability and Its Relationship With Whole-Body Balance in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

De Los Ríos-Calonge J, Juan-Recio C, Prat-Luri A, Miralles-Iborra A, López-Elvira JL, Barbado D, Vera-Garcia FJ

Smartphone-Based Field Assessment of Trunk Stability and Its Relationship With Whole-Body Balance in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e83546

DOI: 10.2196/83546

PMID: 41848434

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Smartphone-based field assessment of trunk stability and its relationship with whole-body balance in older adults: cross-sectional study.

  • Javier De Los Ríos-Calonge; 
  • Casto Juan-Recio; 
  • Amaya Prat-Luri; 
  • Aarón Miralles-Iborra; 
  • José Luis López-Elvira; 
  • David Barbado; 
  • Francisco José Vera-Garcia

ABSTRACT

Background:

Maintaining balance is essential for older adults to preserve independence and reduce fall risk. However, empirical evidence linking trunk stability with balance and gait is scarce, partly due to the lack of accessible field tests. Smartphone-based accelerometry field tests offer a promising approach to assess trunk stability outside the laboratory.

Objective:

To determine (a) the association between trunk stability and whole-body balance and gait, and (b) to extent to which trunk stability and whole-body balance field tests align with laboratory-based assessments in older adults.

Methods:

Fifty-seven physically active older adults performed two trunk stability (i.e., the lumbopelvic stability [field] and the unstable sitting posturographic [laboratory] tests), two whole-body balance (i.e., the tandem stance posturographic [laboratory] and the whole-body static balance [field] tests) and two gait-related tests (i.e., the straight-line gait and the modified Timed Up & Go [field] tests) two times. A Spearman correlation analysis was performed after assessing the reliability of the variables.

Results:

Significant positive low-to-high correlations were found between the lumbopelvic stability and the whole-body static balance tests (.380

Conclusions:

Better static lumbopelvic control during exercises like back bridge and bird-dog is linked to improved whole-body balance in active older adults, suggesting these positions be included in future interventions to enhance trunk stability. Accessible smartphone-based field tests for lumbopelvic stability offer a promising approach for standardized assessment of trunk stability. However, direct extrapolation from field tools to laboratory findings is unfeasible due to lack of correlation. These findings highlight the potential of smartphone-based field tests to complement clinical and research assessments of balance in older adults.


 Citation

Please cite as:

De Los Ríos-Calonge J, Juan-Recio C, Prat-Luri A, Miralles-Iborra A, López-Elvira JL, Barbado D, Vera-Garcia FJ

Smartphone-Based Field Assessment of Trunk Stability and Its Relationship With Whole-Body Balance in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Aging 2026;9:e83546

DOI: 10.2196/83546

PMID: 41848434

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.