Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 31, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 19, 2025 - Nov 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Symptoms of Depression: Feasibility Cohort Study

Amarti K, Schulte MHJ, Kleiboer A, van Genugten C, Oudega M, Rocha A, Riper H

Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Symptoms of Depression: Feasibility Cohort Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e83316

DOI: 10.2196/83316

PMID: 42398066

Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Older Adults with symptoms of depression: a feasibility study

  • Khadicha Amarti; 
  • Mieke H. J. Schulte; 
  • Annet Kleiboer; 
  • Claire van Genugten; 
  • Mardien Oudega; 
  • Artur Rocha; 
  • Heleen Riper

ABSTRACT

Background:

Depressive symptoms are common among older adults and can significantly impact their quality of life. Yet, many older adults face barriers to accessing psychological treatment. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) is a promising alternative to face-to-face treatments, but its feasibility among older adults is less researched.

Objective:

This study evaluated the feasibility of guided iCBT for adults aged 55 and older with mild to moderate depressive symptoms recruited from the general population.

Methods:

Single-group, pretest-post-test design (N = 21) in which all participants received guided iCBT for 8 weeks. Assessments were taken at baseline (T0), and postintervention (T1). The primary outcome is feasibility conceptualized as satisfaction, usability, engagement and uptake with iCBT. Secondary outcome measures included depression severity, working alliance, and technical alliance.

Results:

Participants were mostly highly educated (62%), female (86%), had an average age of 59.85 (range 55 – 68), and reported moderate digital literacy on average. Feasibility outcomes indicated high satisfaction and engagement, and moderate usability. Working alliance was rated as good by both participants and coaches and technical alliance was rated as moderate by the participants. There was a non-significant modest decrease in depressive symptoms (Cohen’s d=0.47). Of the 20 participants that started the intervention, all completed the first two modules, but completion declined across the remaining six modules, with only one participant completing all modules.

Conclusions:

This study found that guided iCBT can be a feasible option for older adults experiencing depressive symptoms, with participants reporting generally positive satisfaction, engagement and a moderate therapeutic bond with their coaches. However, below average usability ratings and a moderate technical alliance suggest that some aspects of the platform require improvement. Future research should focus on improving usability, adherence, and testing the intervention in larger, more diverse population.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Amarti K, Schulte MHJ, Kleiboer A, van Genugten C, Oudega M, Rocha A, Riper H

Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Symptoms of Depression: Feasibility Cohort Study

JMIR Form Res 2026;10:e83316

DOI: 10.2196/83316

PMID: 42398066

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.