Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Sep 08, 2026)
Date Submitted: Sep 4, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 7, 2025 - Nov 2, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Enhancing Problem-Based Learning in Undergraduate Sports Medicine Education with DeepSeek AI: A Comparative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
Problem-based learning (PBL) is a cornerstone of modern medical education, yet its effectiveness can be hindered by inconsistent student engagement and facilitator variability. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) like DeepSeek offers a potential to revolutionize pedagogical approaches by assisting in content creation and lesson design.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a DeepSeek-assisted PBL teaching model compared to traditional lecture-based teaching on undergraduate medical students’ academic performance, learning efficiency, and satisfaction in a sports medicine course.
Methods:
A quasi-experimental study was conducted with two randomly assigned classes of fourth-year medical students. The control group (n=33) received a traditional multimedia lecture on sports injuries. The experimental group (n=80) received a PBL session on the same topic, where the content was developed with the assistance of DeepSeek. Both groups completed a 20-item knowledge assessment and a 5-domain satisfaction survey immediately after the 45-minute session. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare outcomes due to non-normal data distribution.
Results:
There was no significant difference in post-test scores between the traditional and DeepSeek-assisted PBL groups (82.27 vs 81.00, P=.64). Although the DeepSeek group completed the assessment faster (493.58 seconds vs 556.06 seconds), this difference was not statistically significant (P=.27). Overall satisfaction was high in both groups. Notably, the DeepSeek-assisted PBL group reported higher satisfaction rates in specific domains: 97.5% of students were satisfied with teaching resources (including AI-assisted tools) and instructor interaction.
Conclusions:
The integration of DeepSeek AI into a PBL framework did not lead to superior academic performance in the short term compared to traditional methods. However, its potential to enhance learning efficiency and student satisfaction with interactive resources is promising. These findings suggest that AI-assisted PBL is a feasible and engaging pedagogical tool. Future research should explore long-term integration, optimized prompt engineering, and qualitative insights to fully leverage AI's potential in medical education.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.