Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Participatory Medicine
Date Submitted: Aug 28, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 4, 2025 - Oct 30, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Veteran Preferences for Technology-Assisted Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement of Mental Health Symptoms
ABSTRACT
Background:
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is promoting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection for measurement-based mental healthcare. Understanding Veteran preferences about how and when to complete PROMs is critical to support their implementation.
Objective:
We examined Veteran preferences for timing and use of different technology platforms to complete mental health-related PROMs.
Methods:
We invited a national sample of 1,373 Veterans to complete a survey; 858 (63%) responded. Surveys asked about Veteran preferences for how and when to complete mental health-related PROMs. We characterized responses using descriptive statistics, and estimated multiple logistic regression models to examine associations between Veteran demographic and health characteristics and preferences for completing PROMS.
Results:
Most Veterans preferred completing PROMs between appointments (76%) using features of a patient portal (51%), during appointments (74%) verbally (52%), and while at the medical center (60%) on paper (24%) or a tablet computer (23%). Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic) Veterans had 3.32 times higher odds of preferring to complete PROMs at the medical center (95%CI:1.04-10.58), and Veterans with lower (vs. higher) socioeconomic status had lower odds (OR:0.61, 95%CI:0.40-0.93) of preferring to complete PROMs in between appointments, but 1.97 times higher odds (95%CI:1.23-3.16) of preferring to complete PROMs during appointments.
Conclusions:
As VHA and other healthcare systems seek to expand the integration of PROM data into healthcare services, adaptive and flexible approaches to PROM administration that align with patient preferences, including those that leverage technology platforms in the remote collection of these data, may bolster implementation. Our results indicate that such implementation efforts should consider patient ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Our findings further suggest that these efforts could benefit from incorporating PROM administration into online patient portals, developing mobile health apps that support PROMs completion through patient’s personal devices in between clinical encounters, and engaging care team members in PROM administration during appointments. Clinical Trial: N/A
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.