Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently accepted at: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 25, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Nov 27, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026
Date Accepted: Mar 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

This paper has been accepted and is currently in production.

It will appear shortly on 10.2196/82960

The final accepted version (not copyedited yet) is in this tab.

Digital Quality Monitoring for Type-2 Diabetes in Swiss Primary Care: A Qualitative Interview Study

  • Odile-Florence Giger; 
  • Lola Jo Ackermann; 
  • Marinja Principe; 
  • Simon Meier; 
  • Elgar Fleisch; 
  • Susanna Gallani; 
  • Michael Brändle; 
  • Tobias Kowatsch; 
  • Mia Jovanova

ABSTRACT

Background:

Primary care physicians manage most type 2 diabetes (T2D) cases worldwide but face increasing workload pressures and limited infrastructure. To support consistent, guideline-based care, the Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Dia-betology (SSED) developed a quality monitoring tool known as the SSED score. The score evaluates whether essential care processes have been completed for each individual with T2D. These processes include HbA1c testing, blood pres-sure measurement, and screening for diabetes-related complications. By aggre-gating these elements, the SSED score provides a structured way to assess ad-herence to recommended standards of diabetes care. Although this approach shows promise for improving health outcomes, the score is currently mostly available in paper format and creates additional administrative burden for phy-sicians.

Objective:

This study explored challenges in T2D management in Swiss primary care, as-sessed the limitations of the SSED quality score, and identified strategies to ena-ble its adoption in routine practice.

Methods:

We conducted 38 semi-structured interviews following the COREQ guidelines with key stakeholders involved in T2D care in Switzerland: 12 healthcare pro-fessionals, 12 individuals with T2D, five health insurers, and nine healthcare software developers. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results:

Participants highlighted persistent challenges in T2D management, including time pressure for health care professionals, fragmented care, and lack of per-sonalized support. Barriers to digital quality monitoring included poor integra-tion with GP systems, misaligned incentives, and limited relevance to multi-morbidity. Suggested facilitators included embedding tools into workflows, en-abling task shifting for physicians, integrating patient-centered features and improving data sharing.

Conclusions:

A digital SSED score could support GPs by integrating patient-entered data, generating automated alerts, and enabling pharmacy-based follow-up. Success-ful adoption depends on GP workflow integration, system interoperability, and aligned incentives that promote engagement for individuals with T2D. Involv-ing stakeholders early is essential to ensure that new digital tools meet the needs of both individuals with T2D and GPs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Giger OF, Ackermann LJ, Principe M, Meier S, Fleisch E, Gallani S, Brändle M, Kowatsch T, Jovanova M

Digital Quality Monitoring for Type-2 Diabetes in Swiss Primary Care: A Qualitative Interview Study

Journal of Medical Internet Research. 16/03/2026:82960 (forthcoming/in press)

DOI: 10.2196/82960

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/82960

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.