Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 22, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 22, 2025 - Oct 17, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 13, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
School and community stakeholder perceptions of a free, confidential digital mental health platform (Soluna): A mixed-methods study examining barriers and facilitators to real-world implementation at scale and early impact
ABSTRACT
Background:
Mental health disorders are common among adolescents worldwide, yet access to preventive and early intervention services remains limited. Digital mental health platforms may help bridge this gap, but little is known about how these platforms are perceived, implemented, and adopted by school and community stakeholders during early stages of rollout in real-world youth-serving settings.
Objective:
This study examines school and community stakeholders’ perceptions of a new, free, confidential digital mental health platform for youth (Soluna) in its first year of rollout, focusing on its features, barriers and facilitators to early implementation and adoption, and early stakeholder perceptions of its perceived impact on youth mental health.
Methods:
Surveys were distributed to 77 stakeholders (54 school staff, 23 community staff) in California from February to April 2025. Eligible participants were frontline staff directly engaging with youth in settings where the platform was offered. Following the survey, 17 stakeholders (12 school, 5 community) participated in semi-structured interviews via Zoom. Survey data were analyzed descriptively to summarize perceptions and experiences, while interview data were analyzed using inductive-deductive reflexive thematic analysis to explore themes related to implementation, facilitators, and barriers.
Results:
Most stakeholders (71.4%) agreed that the platform positively contributed to youth well-being, and 89.6% felt comfortable referring youth to it indicating good acceptability. Free access (91.0%), availability during non-traditional hours (45.0%), and ease of use (42.0%) were identified by stakeholders as the most valuable features for youth. Facilitators of adoption included digital accessibility (87.0%), confidential peer support (84.1%), and youth choice in engagement (85.7%). Key barriers included stigma around mental health (64.7%) and lack of awareness of the platform’s benefits (61.0%). Qualitative findings revealed three main categories: (1) perceived impact, including support for youth from diverse backgrounds and use as a supplemental resource when traditional services are limited; (2) facilitators to implementation and adoption, such as direct referrals, peer promotion, accessible framing focused on coping and life skills, supportive materials, and engagement from platform staff; and (3) barriers to implementation and adoption, including stigma and phone or internet access challenges in school settings. Stakeholders also emphasized the importance of practical resources and ongoing support to build confidence in using and recommending the platform
Conclusions:
Stakeholders viewed the platform as a valuable and accessible tool to support youth mental health, particularly in underserved communities. Findings suggest that digital mental health platforms should address external barriers to adoption, including stigma around mental health, while also increasing awareness of available resources. Providing tailored implementation support demonstrates progress in these areas and can further strengthen adoption and engagement. These findings offer actionable recommendations for improving the design and delivery of digital mental health platforms in real-world youth-serving settings.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.