Accepted for/Published in: JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Date Submitted: Aug 22, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 25, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 13, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Integrating Extended Reality Into Primary Care Chronic Pain Programs: A Real-World Feasibility Study of the REDOCVR Intervention
ABSTRACT
Background:
Chronic pain management in public health services often struggles with limited engagement, emotional burden and long-term medication use. While extended reality (XR) has shown promise in specialized settings, evidence supporting its real-world implementation in routine primary care remains limited.
Objective:
This paper aims to assess the feasibility and usability of REDOCVR, an XR-supported psychoeducational program, and to examine exploratory clinical outcomes during its integration into group-based chronic pain services in public primary care centers (PCCs).
Methods:
A nonrandomized, hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study was conducted across three PCCs in Catalonia, Spain. Adults with chronic pain (n=42) participated in 8 weekly group sessions led by psychologists and physiotherapists. The intervention embedded 15–20 minutes of co-designed immersive virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) content per session, targeting mindfulness, cognitive reframing, and motor activation. A supervised medication tapering protocol was included in later groups. Primary outcomes were implementation measures (adherence, tolerability, System Usability Scale [SUS], satisfaction). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported clinical measures (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale [WEMWBS], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], Central Sensitization Inventory [CSI], EQ-5D-5L) and medication changes, assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 5-month follow-up.
Results:
A total of 42 participants were enrolled, with 36 (85.7%) completing the intervention and all assessments. Adherence was high, and no serious adverse events were reported. Patient-reported usability was strong (mean SUS score 81.4), while professional usability was moderate (mean SUS score 73.8). Significant improvements were observed in emotional well-being (WEMWBS; Cohen’s d = 0.86), anxiety (HADS-A; d = 0.66), and depression (HADS-D; d = 0.62) (all p < 0.001). Among participants in the tapering protocol (n = 22), mean medication use at 5 months decreased for benzodiazepines (–71.7%) and opioids (–41.8%).
Conclusions:
Integrating XR into established primary care group programs for chronic pain proved feasible and safe, and was acceptable to both patients and professionals. The intervention was associated with statistically significant improvements in emotional well-being and in symptoms of anxiety and depression, as well as reductions in the use of high-risk medications under a supervised tapering protocol. These exploratory findings highlight the potential of XR to strengthen routine nonpharmacological pain care and support progression to larger controlled trials to evaluate scalability and long-term effectiveness. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06361706; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06361706 and NCT06964360; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06964360
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.