Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Aug 22, 2025
Date Accepted: Dec 25, 2025
Uptake of Large Language Models by London Medical Students: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs) has grown exponentially across healthcare. Despite the wealth of literature on proposed applications within medical education, little research has investigated their real-world use.
Objective:
We aimed to determine their real-world benefits, facilitators, and barriers associated with the use of LLMs among medical students in the United Kingdom through semi-structured interviews.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, were conducted with 15 UK medical students from pre-clinical and clinical stages. An inductive thematic analysis was applied to interview transcripts to identify themes around actual system use, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes towards LLMs.
Results:
All participants used LLMs primarily for concise summaries and topic explanations, often favouring these tools over conventional search engines due to convenience and conversational ease. Many students were unaware of other potential applications proposed within the literature, such as simulation of clinical interactions. Significant concerns included inaccuracies and hallucinations, which decreased trust in outputs, especially among less experienced students. Additionally, students reported concerns about developing an overreliance on LLMs, potentially reducing deeper engagement with learning materials.
Conclusions:
LLMs have been widely adopted by UK medical students. There is therefore an urgent need for medical curricula to explicitly address not only effective use of AI technologies but also their broader educational implications, including assessment and curricula redesign. Future research should broaden geographical representation, investigate applications in low-resource settings, and integrate educators’ perspectives to establish future curricular guidance in an AI era. Clinical Trial: Not applicable
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.