Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 21, 2025
Date Accepted: Mar 31, 2026

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

GenAI-Supported Virtual Patients in Health Care Education: Systematic Review

Jiang J, Ye MZ, Kwok TTO, Wong JYH

GenAI-Supported Virtual Patients in Health Care Education: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e82756

DOI: 10.2196/82756

PMID: 42098926

Systematic review of GenAI-supported virtual patients in healthcare education

  • Juming Jiang; 
  • Megan Zichen Ye; 
  • Tyrone Tai-On Kwok; 
  • Janet Yuen Ha Wong

ABSTRACT

Background:

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is revolutionising virtual patient simulations in healthcare education, providing adaptable and interactive learning experiences. Traditional virtual patients rely on scripted responses, while GenAI enhances realism by generating dynamic, case-specific interactions.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to summarise and synthesise empirical research evaluating how GenAI-supported virtual patients influence student training and learning outcomes in healthcare education.

Methods:

A structured systematic review was conducted across CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, identifying 391 studies, of which 10 met inclusion criteria after full-text screening. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed, full-text, focused on GenAI-supported virtual patients in healthcare education, used quantitative or mixed methods, and were written in English. Studies focusing primarily on GenAI model development were excluded.

Results:

The review classified GenAI-supported virtual patients into three key design components: input modalities (text, voice, hybrid), output types (text, synthesised speech), and avatars (3D, non-embodied interfaces). Five studies employed experimental designs with control groups, but none implemented longitudinal assessments. Problem-based learning (PBL) was the only explicitly referenced educational theory, while most studies lacked pedagogical grounding. Self-reported user perceptions dominated evaluation metrics, limiting insights into actual learning outcomes and clinical competency development.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the need for standardised study designs, extended interaction durations, and objective learning assessments. To maximise effectiveness, future research should integrate educational theories, refine GenAI interaction designs, and establish long-term evaluations. Insights and evidence-based recommendations are offered for educators, researchers, and policymakers seeking to enhance healthcare training through advanced technological interventions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jiang J, Ye MZ, Kwok TTO, Wong JYH

GenAI-Supported Virtual Patients in Health Care Education: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e82756

DOI: 10.2196/82756

PMID: 42098926

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.