Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Aug 17, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 19, 2025 - Oct 14, 2025
Date Accepted: Nov 7, 2025
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 8, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Self-Examination

Nayyar S

Evaluating the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Self-Examination

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e82550

DOI: 10.2196/82550

PMID: 41205210

PMCID: 12661592

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Self-screening

  • Shirish Nayyar

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the increasing accessibility of artificial intelligence (AI), the general population is frequently engaging with conversational AI platforms to understand topics related to health and well-being. Breast cancer remains a significant global health issue, ranking as the second most common cancer in women and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While breast self-examination (BSE) is not a replacement for professional screening, it promotes body awareness and may support earlier recognition of changes. Evaluating AI’s role in patient education regarding such practices is therefore timely and important.

Objective:

This viewpoint aimed to explore the potential and limitations of AI-based conversational models in providing health advice on breast self-screening, using DeepSeek AI as an exemplar.

Methods:

A qualitative review was conducted of a dialogue session with DeepSeek AI, where six commonly asked questions regarding breast self-examination were posed. Responses were assessed in comparison with guidance from established health organisations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and Breastcancer.org. The evaluation focused on accuracy, comprehensibility, and alignment with evidence-based practices.

Results:

DeepSeek AI generated comprehensive and accessible responses, employing language suitable for the general population and maintaining consistency with professional recommendations. The model explained BSE techniques clearly, acknowledged alternative approaches, and consistently emphasised that self-examination is complementary rather than a substitute for medical screening. However, notable limitations included insufficient emphasis on the limited mortality benefits of BSE, lack of references to individual variability (e.g., dense breast tissue), and absence of links to credible video resources, which may enhance understanding for visual learners.

Conclusions:

AI-driven dialogues demonstrate promise in reinforcing public health practices such as breast self-examination, offering accurate and comprehensible information. Nevertheless, oversimplification, inadequate contextualisation, and lack of integration with multimedia resources remain challenges. For responsible use in health education, AI responses should be supplemented by physician oversight, structured public health campaigns, and clear signposting to diagnostic services. Strengthening AI outputs with evidence-based statistics and visual learning resources can optimise their role as supportive tools in preventive health. Clinical Trial: N/A


 Citation

Please cite as:

Nayyar S

Evaluating the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Self-Examination

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e82550

DOI: 10.2196/82550

PMID: 41205210

PMCID: 12661592

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.