Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Aug 15, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 17, 2025 - Oct 12, 2025
Date Accepted: Oct 28, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mixed Methods Study

Timmis JK, Schorr KA, Yüksel R, van den Broek T, Overeem S, Smid DJ, van den Brink WJ, Haring NL

Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e82460

DOI: 10.2196/82460

PMID: 41505749

PMCID: 12828318

Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a mixed-methods study

  • James Kenneth Timmis; 
  • Kerstin Alexandra Schorr; 
  • Rana Yüksel; 
  • Tim van den Broek; 
  • Sebastiaan Overeem; 
  • Dagmar Josine Smid; 
  • Willem Johan van den Brink; 
  • Nina Leonie Haring

ABSTRACT

Background:

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a sleep disorder characterized by repeated breathing disruptions during sleep. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of OSA is important yet contemporary methods are limited. Sensor-based digital health technologies (sDHTs) promise step advances in OSA RPM. However, for sDHT based RPM solutions to be adopted, they must be meaningful, actionable and usable for patients. While the centrality of considering patient views in sDHT development is widely acknowledged, patient perspectives and priorities are rarely assessed and thus included in new sDHTs.

Objective:

To contribute towards addressing this gap, we explored by means of a mixed-methods study based on the Digital Medicine Society’s (DiMe) Digital Measures That Matter framework meaningful aspects of health and digital measures that could enhance OSA care quality and patient experience.

Methods:

We included individuals who had been formally diagnosed with OSA and reported persistent sleep problems (n=223), and asked them to (i) rank survey items to elicit key priorities, and (ii) provide additional data in open-ended questions to obtain initial qualitative insights. To gain deeper qualitative insights, we also conducted semi-structured interviews with formally diagnosed OSA patients, patient advocates, and healthcare professionals (n=11). The interviews covered the themes follow-up care, attitudes toward sDHTs and RPM, and preferences for future OSA-related sDHTs and metrics. To analyze our quantitative data, we used bootstrap-aggregated Borda counts to identify overall (broad) support per item, and Plackett-Luce modelling to assess agreement (intense prioritization) per item rank. Qualitative data elicited in the survey and interviews were analysed thematically.

Results:

We found that, firstly, for patients, improving subjective sleep quality, increasing physical activity, and increasing daytime energy levels are key meaningful aspects of health. Secondly, sleep characteristics (particularly sleep fragmentation), daytime energy (focus on fatigue and excessive daytime sleepiness), and nighttime oxygen saturation, as priority targets for digital measure development. Thirdly, smartwatches, sleep mats, and smart rings are strongly preferred as modalities for sDHTs that can be integrated into future RPM solutions. Fourthly, when enhancing current digital monitoring practices the focus should be on: (1) expanding metrics beyond AHI, (2) improving measurement accuracy, and (3) ensuring that digital measures are meaningful, understandable and actionable for end-users. Finally, patients lack the ability to determine from RPM output whether they need to seek follow-up care and, if so, what type of care is appropriate.

Conclusions:

Our findings underscore the need to expand and refine RPM solutions beyond traditional metrics, ensuring that digital measures are accurate, transparent, and actionable to support comprehensive, patient-centered OSA management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Timmis JK, Schorr KA, Yüksel R, van den Broek T, Overeem S, Smid DJ, van den Brink WJ, Haring NL

Toward Patient-Centric Digital Monitoring of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mixed Methods Study

J Med Internet Res 2026;28:e82460

DOI: 10.2196/82460

PMID: 41505749

PMCID: 12828318

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.