Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Sep 29, 2025)
Date Submitted: Aug 14, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 15, 2025 - Oct 10, 2025
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Evaluating Online Medical Information Quality in Colon Surgery Using Pre-Tuned Large Language Models.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Online medical information in colon surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted procedures, is frequently inconsistent, outdated, or misleading, which can hinder patient education and informed decision-making. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in complex text analysis, but their potential for assessing the quality of medical web content has not been systematically explored. The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) 36 criteria offer a standardized framework for evaluating patient-facing materials, but manual assessments are time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Objective:
To systematically evaluate the ability of multiple transformer-based LLMs to classify the quality of online information on robotic colon surgery according to the EQIP 36 criteria, and to determine whether embedding-oriented or generative models provide better performance for this task.
Methods:
English-language web pages on robotic colon surgery were collected in December 2023 via automated searches on Google, Bing, and Yahoo using predefined keywords. From 450 retrieved URLs, duplicates, irrelevant content, and professional/academic sites were removed, resulting in 47 unique patient-targeted websites with expert EQIP ratings. Due to input length limitations, texts were split into overlapping 512-token chunks (50-token overlap) before embedding extraction. Models evaluated included base BERT, custom pre-trained BERT, BiomedBERT, pre-trained BiomedBERT, SBERT, LLaMA-2 (concatenated and averaged embeddings), and Longformer. Chunk embeddings were concatenated into document-level embeddings and classified via a feedforward multilabel neural network predicting 19 EQIP items. Hyperparameters (batch size, learning rate, dropout) were optimized via grid search. Performance was assessed using stratified 5-fold cross-validation, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC as metrics.
Results:
SBERT achieved the highest performance (F1-score = 80.16, accuracy = 79.05%, AUC = 0.79), outperforming all other models. Pre-trained BiomedBERT and custom pre-trained BERT performed comparably well (F1 ≈ 0.79), indicating benefits from domain-specific adaptation. LLaMA-2 with concatenated embeddings (F1 = 0.784) outperformed the averaged embedding version (F1 = 0.765) but remained below SBERT. Longformer, despite handling longer contexts, had the lowest performance (F1 = 70.07). Across models, those optimized for generating semantically meaningful embeddings consistently surpassed generative architectures.
Conclusions:
Transformer-based models optimized for embedding generation, particularly SBERT, are more effective than large generative models in automated EQIP-based quality assessment of online medical content. Domain-specific adaptation improves performance, but embedding quality is a more critical determinant than model size. These findings support the integration of embedding-focused LLMs into scalable, AI-driven tools for medical content evaluation, potentially enhancing the accessibility and reliability of online patient education. Future research should expand datasets, explore ensemble approaches, and address regulatory and ethical considerations for deployment in healthcare contexts.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.