Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors
Date Submitted: Aug 13, 2025
Date Accepted: Jan 9, 2026
Developing Mobile Health IT for Older Adult Medication Safety: The RAPID Method for Remote Participatory Co-Design
ABSTRACT
Background:
Participatory co-design is a design approach that involves end-users in intervention design and its use in healthcare applications has become widespread. Traditionally, co-design has been conducted in-person in a lab-based setting however, it has recently shifted to being performed remotely. Remote co-design has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of traditional in-person approaches including expanding a study’s geographic reach, recruiting participants from underrepresented groups, reducing power imbalances between researchers and participants, and enhancing engagement through online tools. Given these benefits, further reporting and refinement of remote co-design methods is needed.
Objective:
This paper’s objective is to present our Remote and Accessible Participatory Intervention Design (RAPID) method and discuss the choices and challenges we encountered adapting participatory co-design for remote use.
Methods:
We adapted our previously developed 5-step in-person participatory co-design method health intervention design. To apply the adapted co-design method, we recruited two groups of five participants (one of older adult pharmacy patients and the other of pharmacy staff) to design a digital kiosk for use by older adults to promote safe over-the-counter medication purchases in retail pharmacies.
Results:
Adaptations made to the co-design process were classified under the following categories: facilitation; collaboration, communication, and sensemaking; accessibility and universality; tangible tools and games; and research compliance. Overall, the remote co-design process took longer when compared to in-person due to shorter sessions and between session refinement, but it allowed for flexible scheduling and makeup sessions when required.
Conclusions:
Our RAPID method offers an approach to remote co-design that other teams can implement or adapt to their needs. Our experiences with RAPID identify certain drawbacks to remote co-design, however, these are balanced by advantages in convenience and flexibility.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.