Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Preprints

Date Submitted: Aug 11, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 11, 2025 - Jul 27, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nepotism and Recruitment Integrity in Nigerian Human Resource Management (2009 - 2025)

  • Lolo Teddy Adias

ABSTRACT

This study explores unethical HR practices in Nigerian organizations, focusing on nepotism, bribery, gender bias, and ethnic favoritism in recruitment, and their impact on organizational performance from 2009 to 2025. Despite various reforms, these unethical practices persist, undermining the fairness of recruitment processes, eroding employee morale, and negatively impacting productivity. This research is motivated by the need to assess the prevalence and ethical implications of nepotism and other unethical practices in Nigerian HRM, understand their impact, and propose practical solutions to enhance recruitment practices. The study aims to address four main objectives: (i) Assess the prevalence of nepotism and its ethical implications in Nigerian HRM practices; (ii) Examine recruitment challenges, including gender bias and ethnic favoritism; (iii) Analyze the impact of unethical HR practices on organizational performance; and (iv) Propose strategies for improving recruitment ethics and reducing nepotism. The study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining secondary data from reports by Transparency International, the World Bank, and McKinsey Nigeria, with qualitative insights from case studies and interviews. This methodology provides a comprehensive view of the state of HRM practices and the challenges faced by organizations in enforcing ethical recruitment. Results show that unethical practices, especially nepotism, bribery, and gender bias, continue to negatively affect both public and private sectors. Despite efforts such as HR ethics training and legal reforms, these practices persist due to political interference, weak enforcement, and a lack of technological adoption. Nepotism in recruitment was found to be particularly prevalent in government agencies, contributing to high turnover and reduced organizational performance. The study concludes that unethical HR practices continue to undermine recruitment processes, necessitating stronger anti-corruption policies, enhanced HR ethics training, and the integration of technology to increase recruitment fairness. It recommends strengthening legal frameworks, adopting automated recruitment systems, introducing whistleblower protections, and conducting regular audits. In the health sector, ethical recruitment is critical for improving patient care, reducing medical errors, and fostering trust in healthcare services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Adias LT

Navigating Ethical Dilemmas: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nepotism and Recruitment Integrity in Nigerian Human Resource Management (2009 - 2025)

JMIR Preprints. 11/08/2025:82236

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.82236

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/82236

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.