Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Date Submitted: Aug 3, 2025
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 14, 2026 - Mar 11, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Addressing the Silent Crisis: Occupational Burnout Among Anesthesiology Professionals in China

  • Haotian Wu; 
  • Danni Li; 
  • Xiaobei Ma; 
  • Bo Hang; 
  • Xiaobin Xu; 
  • Xiuyun Wu; 
  • Yang Su; 
  • Qi Zhang; 
  • LingJun Chen; 
  • Xintong Dong; 
  • Chunyu Feng; 
  • Yanli Ma; 
  • Fengli Gao; 
  • Huan Zhang

ABSTRACT

Background:

The anesthesiology healthcare workers across various hospital levels in China were invited to participate in an electronic survey.

Objective:

The study aimed to assess the prevalence and impact of occupational burnout among anesthesiologists and anesthetic nurses in China, identifying key factors and providing a scientific basis for intervention strategies. The importance of this research lies in addressing the critical shortage of medical personnel in anesthesiology and its impact on healthcare quality.

Methods:

The primary goal was to provide a comprehensive analysis of occupational burnout among anesthesiologists and nurses in China using an electronic questionnaire. The questionnaire included assessments of occupational burnout, demographic and work-related information, work stress, interpersonal relationships, and health status.

Results:

A total of 1,465 participants were included across China. The response rate was 96.30%, with an overall burnout rate of 79.52%. Anesthesiologists had a burnout rate of 82.51%, and anesthetic nurses had a rate of 72.85%, showing a significant difference (P = 0.000). The prevalence of high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization was 45.80%, with anesthesiologists at 50.30% and nurses at 35.76%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors associated with burnout, including work environment, colleague relationships, and sleep quality for anesthesiologists, and experience, hospital level, and work intensity for anesthetic nurses.

Conclusions:

Occupational burnout is prevalent among anesthesiology professionals in China, with significant implications for individual well-being and patient care. The study's findings call for targeted interventions, such as improving work environments, enhancing education and training, and establishing support systems to mitigate burnout and promote work-life balance. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating effective intervention measures to ensure the well-being of medical professionals and the quality of healthcare services.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wu H, Li D, Ma X, Hang B, Xu X, Wu X, Su Y, Zhang Q, Chen L, Dong X, Feng C, Ma Y, Gao F, Zhang H

Addressing the Silent Crisis: Occupational Burnout Among Anesthesiology Professionals in China

JMIR Preprints. 03/08/2025:81755

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.81755

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/81755

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.